MA
Maybe it's none of your business? I work in a large organisation and we are not privy to that information about our colleagues.
I think with the BBC, or any public organisation for that matter, it's worth being familiar with the Freedom of Information Act.
FOI establishes that the justification for sharing (or not disclosing information) resides with organisation - and it is for them to justify not making perfectly legitimate requests, such as Mark's, available.
I appreciate for commercial companies there may genuinely be a commercial-sensitive reason etc but this type of information is routinely made available - and long should it continue to be!
I'd be interested to know how many BBC staff currently are :-
1: Working from home because they can
2: Working from home because they or their family are displaying CV symptoms
3: Working at their normal BBC premises, because they have to
4: Number of staff furloughed?
5: Off work sick
I would expect the answer to No 4 to be zero?
1: Working from home because they can
2: Working from home because they or their family are displaying CV symptoms
3: Working at their normal BBC premises, because they have to
4: Number of staff furloughed?
5: Off work sick
I would expect the answer to No 4 to be zero?
Maybe it's none of your business? I work in a large organisation and we are not privy to that information about our colleagues.
I think with the BBC, or any public organisation for that matter, it's worth being familiar with the Freedom of Information Act.
FOI establishes that the justification for sharing (or not disclosing information) resides with organisation - and it is for them to justify not making perfectly legitimate requests, such as Mark's, available.
I appreciate for commercial companies there may genuinely be a commercial-sensitive reason etc but this type of information is routinely made available - and long should it continue to be!