The Newsroom

BBC News Channel: Presentation

Move to Broadcasting House and new look today (April 2008)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
HE
headliner101
Of course I know prep time isn't 'a bit', it is quite long! And I would never go into figures, I'm just saying in general the National presenter will probably get paid more than the NC presenter - freelance etc permitting. One question, does George and Jon's jobs with Domestic and World count as two separate jobs?


also how does BBC make it clear to presenters working on both WN and NC that the money came from either licence fee or from the commercially-funded BBC Global News, Ltd?


That's a good question. I don't know what actually goes on but my best guess is that arrangements might be in place so that BBC's domestic operations might technically be customers of BBC Worldwide (BBC's commercial arm). If that is what goes on, BBC's domestic services pays (using licence fee money) BBC Worldwide to use the resources of the latter. In this case, I would think staff who are stationed abroad are on the latter's payroll.
IT
itsrobert Founding member
Moz posted:
The One O'Clock News, for instance, is quite a hairy show by all accounts. They can get away with it at that time of day, but the evening bulletins rightly need to be polished and professional - even at weekends.

So you're saying that the News Channel hours aren't polished & professional?

I'd say they're far better than the 1/6/10 which are often as dull as dishwater.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Over a given length of time there are far more mistakes (the list could be practically endless) on the NC than on the National bulletins. They may be dull in your opinion, but they are technically more professional due to the fact they are planned and rehearsed. The NC is a rolling news channel and anything can happen. This seems obvious to me, Moz - I can't understand why you can't grasp the idea that more thought has to go into the BBC1 bulletins.
WO
Worzel
Nice farewell from Chris just then.
ST
STV Today
Moz posted:
Daniel, that is a very simplistic and naive view of how these things work. If you think the National presenter only works for half an hour with a bit of prep time before then you're mistaken. There's a lot more to it behind the scenes than that. Just take a look at some of the behind the scenes videos on YouTube. There are meetings to attend, scripts to prepare, correspondents with whom to liaise. They don't just turn up a few minutes before TX and read words that other people have written.

And I really wouldn't get into salaries if I were you. For a start, that is a very personal thing and is rather tasteless to speculate about; and secondly, it's frightfully complicated as some will be staffers and others freelance and thus paid by the hour. And hours don't just equate to on air time, either.

I take issue with most what is said above.

Why does it take the presenter of a 30 minute bulletin more time to prepare for something that a News Channel presenter just has to deal with if it breaks when their on air. It's the NC presenters who work harder?

As for salaries? Why are they so secret? They're civil servants in effect and we pay their wages, so we should be told what they earn.


Gosh, I think it is a valid point to debate even though I have no strong opinion. There are valid points from both sides but it depends on what the jobs entail. Editorially, I did not think network bulletin presenters where as involved as American network anchors yet nor did I think that presenters plonked their rear ends in front of a camera to address the nation who do nothing else. My understanding it is somewhere in between.

Personally, I think salaries are none of my business (as is mine to them) yet I think duties and what presenters do is a valid area of discussion here. Most companies are asking their staff to do more for the same money and I cannot see why the BBC should be exempt from this approach.

Moira Stuart was allegedly dumped for not being a journalist and the BBC have made much noise about their presenters being journalists and involved in programmes and output decisions and I can see the value of this. However, there is nothing wrong with having George, Huw, Sophie etc involved in other BBC News output throughout the working day. Sophie is the only one who is linked with one programme but she regularly presents the One and Six bulletins as does Fiona when she is on, so they are hardly lazy.

Sophie was involved in Watchdog Daily and Fiona does AR and Huw is also involved in BBC Wales output from what I can gather so they turn their hands to various things folks. I actually think that they find this half the appeal of doing what they do?

Going forward I would hope there is scope for presenters to be involved in various output; however, I do not think it silly or even naïve to make comment about this.

As for graphics, titles, music and style of the channel and bulletins - I doubt there will be much change tomorrow. Moving to a new home is a challenge enough and when Sky News did all this at once it did not do them any favours. If there is to be a radical change to the look of BBC New, I'd imagine this will be in years to come and not months. They are doing well in ratings so if it ain't broke...
IT
itsrobert Founding member
Yes okay, in general ( not just the BBC) why should they still get paid if it just happenes that they aren't on rota?

Aaaarggh!!!!!!!!! Because they are on a SALARY! That's what a salary is - you have a contract to work for an organisation in return for an agreed salary and annual leave entitlement. If the BBC don't want you to work on a Friday then you'll still get your monthly salary because you're a member of staff. It would be a totally different case for a freelancer as they are paid for the hours they work.
ST
Stedixon
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ,

what started off as an entertaining discussion has now been beaten to death with the salary nonsense. I've lost the will to live unless you lot stay on topic of the change over etc
TC
TCOTV
I did not know where to put this post but I put it here.

Earlier on BBC 3 it was the last 60seconds from TVC. They mentioned it and at the end had a shot of TVC that zoom out to the beat with the 60 seconds logo over lapping. I thought it was a nice little touch.

Hope I am not repeating someone here with this post.
ST
STV Today
Yes okay, in general ( not just the BBC) why should they still get paid if it just happenes that they aren't on rota?

Aaaarggh!!!!!!!!! Because they are on a SALARY! That's what a salary is - you have a contract to work for an organisation in return for an agreed salary and annual leave entitlement. If the BBC don't want you to work on a Friday then you'll still get your monthly salary because you're a member of staff. It would be a totally different case for a freelancer as they are paid for the hours they work.


Yeah that is daft (Sorry DanielK cannot get your point with this one at all) and was not even an area I covered in my last post a few moments ago.

Hey let us just sit back and try to look forward in a nice way to tomorrow at 1pm. I for one hope there are no muck ups for them.

Night all - tomorrow is a big day Very Happy
HA
harshy Founding member
The graphics has crashed on BBC News channel over newsday, fixed now at 1:02
ST
STV Today
The graphics has crashed on BBC News channel over newsday, fixed now at 1:02


Oh sugar - hope the Grelims are sorted!
WO
Worzel
Yes okay, in general ( not just the BBC) why should they still get paid if it just happenes that they aren't on rota?

Aaaarggh!!!!!!!!! Because they are on a SALARY! That's what a salary is - you have a contract to work for an organisation in return for an agreed salary and annual leave entitlement. If the BBC don't want you to work on a Friday then you'll still get your monthly salary because you're a member of staff. It would be a totally different case for a freelancer as they are paid for the hours they work.


Yeah that is daft (Sorry DanielK cannot get your point with this one at all) and was not even an area I covered in my last post a few moments ago.

Hey let us just sit back and try to look forward in a nice way to tomorrow at 1pm. I for one hope there are no muck ups for them.

Night all - tomorrow is a big day Very Happy


Should this not be in the presenters & rotas thread? I know this thread will be locked later anyway, but... well, you know.

I'm also off - will be up at 8:30 to see the last Breakfast to NC TVC handover - and to see Mr McCoy and co lead in to NBH later today.

BTW: RIP Nighttime Barco backdrop - we won't see that on screen again.
HA
harshy Founding member
Good night will set the PVR to record all this and view it tomorrow night.

Newer posts