CH
Very odd. Goes to show though that the BBC News logo isn't needed on screen.
Not really. It's not just there to look good, you know.
Well with the constant name checks, theme music and titles, I doubt the on-screen logo makes that much of a difference anyway. It's basically just a DOG and with digital receivers today telling you the channel name anyway there isn't any need for it.
What about public places which are playing BBC News?
The colour scheme and studio backdrop are synonymous with BBC News. It is for this reason I resent being told every five minutes I am watching BBC News. I know it's BBC News; I'm not an imbecile. You may argue what if the studio backdrop and graphics were to suddenly change amid a rebrand. Well viewers would still recognise the font, the presenters, the globe motif, the weather maps and the music. All unmistakably BBC. The logo is not the brand.
Oops, think someone forgot it's not Breakfast:]
Very odd. Goes to show though that the BBC News logo isn't needed on screen.
Not really. It's not just there to look good, you know.
Well with the constant name checks, theme music and titles, I doubt the on-screen logo makes that much of a difference anyway. It's basically just a DOG and with digital receivers today telling you the channel name anyway there isn't any need for it.
What about public places which are playing BBC News?
The colour scheme and studio backdrop are synonymous with BBC News. It is for this reason I resent being told every five minutes I am watching BBC News. I know it's BBC News; I'm not an imbecile. You may argue what if the studio backdrop and graphics were to suddenly change amid a rebrand. Well viewers would still recognise the font, the presenters, the globe motif, the weather maps and the music. All unmistakably BBC. The logo is not the brand.