The Newsroom

BBC News Channel: Presentation

Move to Broadcasting House and new look today (April 2008)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
R2
r2ro
cityprod posted:
Hymagumba posted:
cityprod posted:
Are you watching on 4:3 centre cut out? Cos I had no problems viewing those figures, but then I was watching it in Letterbox mode.


thank you for that insight


I just don't understand why anybody watches television these days in 4:3, especially since the broadcasters long ago started doing graphics that were 14:9 safe, not 4:3 safe, in order to persuade everybody over to the widescreen picture.

Like it or not, the future is 16:9 and has been for years.


Well if you're going to buy me a new television then I'll stop watching in 4:3. I, however, won't purchase a new one when my existing 4:3 one does the job just fine.
CI
cityprod
r2ro posted:
cityprod posted:
Hymagumba posted:
cityprod posted:
Are you watching on 4:3 centre cut out? Cos I had no problems viewing those figures, but then I was watching it in Letterbox mode.


thank you for that insight


I just don't understand why anybody watches television these days in 4:3, especially since the broadcasters long ago started doing graphics that were 14:9 safe, not 4:3 safe, in order to persuade everybody over to the widescreen picture.

Like it or not, the future is 16:9 and has been for years.


Well if you're going to buy me a new television then I'll stop watching in 4:3. I, however, won't purchase a new one when my existing 4:3 one does the job just fine.


Both my TV's are 4:3, and I still watch everything in 16:9. It's not the shape of the screen that matters, it's viewing the entire picture that matters. If you watch a 16:9 programme in 4:3 centre cut out, you are missing about 30% of the picture. To me, it's a no-brainer. Watch it in letterbox. You don't need a new TV to experience widescreen.
TI
timgraham
But if you have it letterboxed you're wasting 30% of your screen with black bars.

It depends on what you're watching, I usually have it letterboxed because most Australian channels use 14:9 safe areas and you miss bits any other way. But things like news don't need the glory of 16:9.
PE
Pete Founding member
cityprod posted:
Both my TV's are 4:3, and I still watch everything in 16:9. It's not the shape of the screen that matters, it's viewing the entire picture that matters. If you watch a 16:9 programme in 4:3 centre cut out, you are missing about 30% of the picture. To me, it's a no-brainer. Watch it in letterbox. You don't need a new TV to experience widescreen.


do you have a tendency to wear wedding dresses by any chance?
that'll go over the heads of 90% of the members no doubt
DU
Dunedin
To clarify, my personal TV is a widescreen TV and I'm all for the widescreen movement. However, I happened to see this particular segment of news on an old 4:3 TV.

The issue isn't really another debate about the merits of widescreen tv- that's been debated ad nauseum

The point I was making was really that the BBC clearly have guidelines for their graphics on the News Channel- hence why every other bit of screen furniture is designed to be seen on a 4:3 screen. The market index graphic simply didn't fit and as such was shoddy in appearance and effect.
WO
Worzel
Dunedin posted:
A new quite brilliant low achieved by the News Channel graphics team today.

The quite nice (but far too big) FTSE graphic that they've been using above the right edge of the aston was expanded to allow both the FTSE and DOW Jones to be shown (around opening bell time for the US). The result was a stacked effect above the aston, at a far more appropriate size for each index. However, they managed to completely ignore the safe area guidelines, meaning that on a 4:3 screen, the FTSE was down a mere 35 points and the DOW a mere 40.

It's really shoddy. And the worst thing is that it was still on the screen when I tuned back in half an hour later.

Assuming the people in charge of these graphics weren't asleep (or on a very long lunch), you can only assume that they decided it wasn't worth correcting. A pretty dire state of affairs.


The ticker has been juddering away with the Hippy Shakes for the past 2 weeks so Graphical Maintanance is obviously not their top priority. Wink
JF
JamesyFish
Mr Wilcox appears to be doing a double shift today... what a surprise... Rolling Eyes

EDIT: Now James Landale has taken over half hour into the 11am shift
CI
cityprod
Dunedin posted:
To clarify, my personal TV is a widescreen TV and I'm all for the widescreen movement. However, I happened to see this particular segment of news on an old 4:3 TV.

The issue isn't really another debate about the merits of widescreen tv- that's been debated ad nauseum

The point I was making was really that the BBC clearly have guidelines for their graphics on the News Channel- hence why every other bit of screen furniture is designed to be seen on a 4:3 screen. The market index graphic simply didn't fit and as such was shoddy in appearance and effect.


Except that for the past 10 years or so, BBC TV has framed everything, including graphics to be 14:9 safe, not 4:3 safe. On my 4:3 TV, if I watch it in 4:3 , graphics are obviously clipped , the BBC News logo in the bottom left is quite badly clipped.
CI
cityprod
timgraham posted:
But if you have it letterboxed you're wasting 30% of your screen with black bars.

It depends on what you're watching, I usually have it letterboxed because most Australian channels use 14:9 safe areas and you miss bits any other way. But things like news don't need the glory of 16:9.


I wouldn't call black bars a waste of the screen, and I honestly think channels should now be setting themselves up graphically as 16:9 channels, rather than 4:3 channels with extra space on either side. We've had 10 years of transition, that's long enough.
CI
cityprod
Hymagumba posted:
cityprod posted:
Both my TV's are 4:3, and I still watch everything in 16:9. It's not the shape of the screen that matters, it's viewing the entire picture that matters. If you watch a 16:9 programme in 4:3 centre cut out, you are missing about 30% of the picture. To me, it's a no-brainer. Watch it in letterbox. You don't need a new TV to experience widescreen.


do you have a tendency to wear wedding dresses by any chance?
that'll go over the heads of 90% of the members no doubt


No I don't, and to be honest, it went over my head too.
DA
Davidjb Founding member
goldfish97 posted:
Mr Wilcox appears to be doing a double shift today... what a surprise... Rolling Eyes

EDIT: Now James Landale has taken over half hour into the 11am shift


Yes i was quite suprised to see James appear just after the 1 had finished. Has he done News Channel studio presenting before? Still i guess we may see a few diffrerent people in the NC studio over the next week or so as a few more presenters have now been shipped out to the U.S.
TI
timgraham
cityprod posted:

I wouldn't call black bars a waste of the screen, and I honestly think channels should now be setting themselves up graphically as 16:9 channels, rather than 4:3 channels with extra space on either side. We've had 10 years of transition, that's long enough.
They're useful sometimes but reducing the size makes everything smaller, harder to distinguish, and harder to read - and it's a CRT screen to begin with so not the clearest thing. Just as long as it isn't squashed, which looks awful.

Newer posts