HC
Because, regardless of the rationality of the argument, it never ends well when the BBC public declares that it is cutting funding for news while continuing to pay for Strictly Come Dancing / Joey Essex / Can't Touch This / Eastenders / Holby City / whatever this week's light entertainment lightning-rod of the week happens to be.
Can I remind you that the BBC mission values are to 'inform, educate and entertain'
Something it does quite well. And, guess what?
Because of that statement, it'll make and broadcast programmes that you don't like or would not want to watch.
It's called public service broadcasting.
Seems to me, you would revise that mission statement to be 'inform, educate, and err....'
Because, regardless of the rationality of the argument, it never ends well when the BBC public declares that it is cutting funding for news while continuing to pay for Strictly Come Dancing / Joey Essex / Can't Touch This / Eastenders / Holby City / whatever this week's light entertainment lightning-rod of the week happens to be.
Can I remind you that the BBC mission values are to 'inform, educate and entertain'
Something it does quite well. And, guess what?
Because of that statement, it'll make and broadcast programmes that you don't like or would not want to watch.
It's called public service broadcasting.
Seems to me, you would revise that mission statement to be 'inform, educate, and err....'
Last edited by Hatton Cross on 12 April 2016 7:29pm