Not that the technology went wrong, the cameras worked fine it was just that the presenter was in the wrong place for the command put in
Do you know this for a fact?
(folds arms, waits for you to dig bigger hole)
It's more likely to be operator error (garbage in, garbage out - the technology did as it was told) or presenter error than it being a technical failure despite correct operation.
Not that the technology went wrong, the cameras worked fine it was just that the presenter was in the wrong place for the command put in
Do you know this for a fact?
(folds arms, waits for you to dig bigger hole)
No just an assumption based on it looking just like a regular opening when the presenter is at the desk. If he'd been sitting there then all would have been fine.
So however it happened it was a discrepancy between what the system was told to do and what the team decided to to do to open the programme.
The opening was for the presenter standing at the screens. You can tell by the way the studio cam pans ACROSS the studio. If the presenter is sitting the studio cam will pan AROUND the studio. The fault here wasn't Simon, it's just the camera that Simon was looking at decided to do it's own thing right at the last second.
Last time there was only a single person reviewing the papers with the presenter? Subtitles appear to suggest that there were meant to be two tonight, but only one is there.
Last time there was only a single person reviewing the papers with the presenter? Subtitles appear to suggest that there were meant to be two tonight, but only one is there.
That would have been this morning as the AM paper review only ever has one reviewer...
