This may have popped up elsewhere so sorry if it has but did anyone see the new look paper review over the weekend. They seem to be using graphic overlays such as the papers scrolling round the desk and the paper they are reviewing layered over the glass wall, same tech as they use for match of the day.
This may have popped up elsewhere so sorry if it has but did anyone see the new look paper review over the weekend. They seem to be using graphic overlays such as the papers scrolling round the desk and the paper they are reviewing layered over the glass wall, same tech as they use for match of the day.
This may have popped up elsewhere so sorry if it has but did anyone see the new look paper review over the weekend. They seem to be using graphic overlays such as the papers scrolling round the desk and the paper they are reviewing layered over the glass wall, same tech as they use for match of the day.
Almost the same tech.
The rendering for both is Viz derived I believe.
On MOTD they are using a manual jib with additional motion sensors added to it to capture position and PTZ data (I think the jib base has to work in a fixed position for this - as I don't think base position is captured and is, instead, pre-set).
For the News Channel Papers AR - they are just using data from the Furio that already exists (as the camera's position on the track, pan, tilt, zoom and focus is remotely controlled).
Was the theme for The Papers slightly remixed when the AR was introduced? I've not watched it in full since then, and it sounded a bit different to me.
Normally in the US big interviews like this would only contain excerpts and a usually a maximum time limit of about a minute or two. With big interviews certain excerpts that maybe newsworthy (and cause viewers to tune in) will be provided ahead of time with a large logo saying “exclusive”. I’m not sure how the networks distribute the preview clips ahead of time.
In some instances, if the interview is of particular national interest, the broadcaster doing it will make it available to other broadcasters - as we saw with the interview with Prince Harry and Meghan the other week, which was done by the Beeb but made available to all broadcasters.
There was actually one example in the eighties of TVam getting an exclusive interview with Princess Michael of Kent, which was big news because it was the first time she'd spoken about her dad being in the SS. The convention was that they would then pool it with other broadcasters but they refused to give it to the Beeb, despite Buckingham Palace requesting that they did. So they just taped it off the telly (which was fair enough, I suppose) but then syndicated it around the world (which probably wasn't).
ITV Studios Daytime produced it, the overarching arm or ITV Studios that looks after GMB, Lorraine, This Morning & Loose Women.
Since I’m not in the UK and can’t watch it could they not follow the typical journalistic principles?
:-(
A former member
Why on earth is the BBC including that gutter crap Buzzfeed? Even the Sun got better standards that bird cage filler. No wonder people complain about the BBC, if it review make crap.
Buzzfeed is quite well respected for its journalism and they've got a decent scoop with the leaked Brexit impact reports, why shouldn't that be featured?
Buzzfeed is quite well respected for its journalism and they've got a decent scoop with the leaked Brexit impact reports, why shouldn't that be featured?
The more serious stuff is done properly. The logical extension to your argument is that BBC News is crap because of the stuff BBC Three and BBC Comedy put out.
