IT
I quite agree. Youngsters are hugely influenced by what they see on TV. More often than not, behaviours seen on TV are repeated and then spread by peer influence. The BBC should be setting an example of good grammar and diction - it's what they always used to do. I accept that they can't do that in programmes like EastEnders because it would undermine the credibility of the programme (in that it needs to be as real as possible). However, the news is a completely different matter.
Some here are arguing that BBC ONE should introduce a "trendy" summary to appeal to youngsters because the channel has a duty to cater for all people, including youngsters. However, the converse to that is the alienation of the vast majority of BBC ONE's audience. I think a balance needs to be reached between serious news and light stories but the scripts should not be watered down in any circumstances.
itsrobert
Founding member
Moz posted:
I think Newsbeat is hugely patronising. It uses words like 'stuff' which are only added to make it sound cool. The BBC should be trying to improve the diction of our youth, not embracing Vikki Pollard vocabulary.
I quite agree. Youngsters are hugely influenced by what they see on TV. More often than not, behaviours seen on TV are repeated and then spread by peer influence. The BBC should be setting an example of good grammar and diction - it's what they always used to do. I accept that they can't do that in programmes like EastEnders because it would undermine the credibility of the programme (in that it needs to be as real as possible). However, the news is a completely different matter.
Some here are arguing that BBC ONE should introduce a "trendy" summary to appeal to youngsters because the channel has a duty to cater for all people, including youngsters. However, the converse to that is the alienation of the vast majority of BBC ONE's audience. I think a balance needs to be reached between serious news and light stories but the scripts should not be watered down in any circumstances.