NG
Yep - I think most of the digital rad cams currently in use are aroun 2.4GHz - and the COFDM system doesn't cope well with impulse noise like radar.
That said - even camcorders can suffer from it - though they usually have to be closer. It is a nightmare on navy vessels.
noggin
Founding member
dosxuk posted:
Radar also doesn't play very nicely with 2.4GHz radio links, as used on the majority of BBC News vans I've seen recently. If you're in the wrong place at the wrong height, you can struggle to get a usable signal back.
On analogue, it's characterised by a loss of sync and subcarriers at a regular interval, causing pictures and audio to jump / wobble. With digi-links, it often causes sufficient packet loss (on all recievers if in diversity mode) to render the stream unrecoverable, or to drop out until the next intraframe.
On analogue, it's characterised by a loss of sync and subcarriers at a regular interval, causing pictures and audio to jump / wobble. With digi-links, it often causes sufficient packet loss (on all recievers if in diversity mode) to render the stream unrecoverable, or to drop out until the next intraframe.
Yep - I think most of the digital rad cams currently in use are aroun 2.4GHz - and the COFDM system doesn't cope well with impulse noise like radar.
That said - even camcorders can suffer from it - though they usually have to be closer. It is a nightmare on navy vessels.