IT
Why should a tv news channel only show pictures? If you agree to watch a news channel, you agree to watch tickers, bugs, straps, etc etc.
Only in recent years, though. I always chose BBC News 24 and BBC World because they didn't have any tickers or big bugs. They had a simple bug in the top left corner, with astons only.
Now, we have permanent tickers, huge astons which animate every five seconds, explosions denoting breaking news. It's gone crazy. Why can't we have choice anymore? I always chose not to watch Sky News because of their horrendous graphics, but now I'm subjected to them on practically every channel.
I think a back to basics approach is needed -- why not just have pictures with smaller astons? Does anyone actually read the ticker anyway? I never do. I can get all the news I want from the newsreader and astons. After all, a news channel's main aim is to bring us the news in pictures -- why obscure them with lots of annoying junk?
itsrobert
Founding member
Dog posted:
Brekkie Boy posted:
Why did News 24 insist on sticking their own graphics over NWT - not neccessary at all?
I'm getting rather fed up of this on-screen junk on all the news channels generally cutting 1/3 of the picture with often quite useless information.
It was one of the positive things about the "back to basics" BBC Strike 24 News bulletins - no pointless graphics giving us pretty useless information.
I'm getting rather fed up of this on-screen junk on all the news channels generally cutting 1/3 of the picture with often quite useless information.
It was one of the positive things about the "back to basics" BBC Strike 24 News bulletins - no pointless graphics giving us pretty useless information.
Why should a tv news channel only show pictures? If you agree to watch a news channel, you agree to watch tickers, bugs, straps, etc etc.
Only in recent years, though. I always chose BBC News 24 and BBC World because they didn't have any tickers or big bugs. They had a simple bug in the top left corner, with astons only.
Now, we have permanent tickers, huge astons which animate every five seconds, explosions denoting breaking news. It's gone crazy. Why can't we have choice anymore? I always chose not to watch Sky News because of their horrendous graphics, but now I'm subjected to them on practically every channel.
I think a back to basics approach is needed -- why not just have pictures with smaller astons? Does anyone actually read the ticker anyway? I never do. I can get all the news I want from the newsreader and astons. After all, a news channel's main aim is to bring us the news in pictures -- why obscure them with lots of annoying junk?