MO
So newsreaders are redundant in many respects then?
I just feel that graphics coming out of the reporters' ears on VTs is not appropriate, and that the money would be far better spent improving quality of news and training journalists rather than adding tacky garb onto the screen.
Of course newsreaders aren't redundant, I said that both are needed, and the graphics of course should be high quality, not tacky garb coming out of reporters' ears - you're just using extreme, unrealistic, examples.
James Hall posted:
Moz posted:
Thus someone just sat there reading goes in one ear and out the other. If what that person is saying is backed up by text on the screen, you take in twice as much. Add pictures and it doubles again.
So newsreaders are redundant in many respects then?
I just feel that graphics coming out of the reporters' ears on VTs is not appropriate, and that the money would be far better spent improving quality of news and training journalists rather than adding tacky garb onto the screen.
Of course newsreaders aren't redundant, I said that both are needed, and the graphics of course should be high quality, not tacky garb coming out of reporters' ears - you're just using extreme, unrealistic, examples.