MB
I'd hardly call it 'butchering' the end of every news broadcast. To me it makes sense to 'hand' to the regional news. I never understood why we ran a trail at 1830 and then had a regional symbol into the local news when we had opt out headlines at the top, for example. It's joined up television - and hopefully it flows. Is it really that bad that we've lost a wide shot and a move at the end of programmes?
I think that the BBC1 controller has a point - run your popular regional news late and the casual viewer that might channel surf may, just may, stay with you. I agree that the die hard Emmerdale or Corrie viewers wont, but he's not targeting them.
BBC Worlds so called 'invisible' opts are nothing to do with 'holding' viewers. They were introduced to prevent sting, after sting, after sting as the commercial breaks at different times on different streams were introduced. If they hadn't done that it would have looked rediculous if your stream was not opting out.
As for the presenters introducing the programme that was only decided because the Controller wanted Headlines at half past the hour... so it made sense for the presenter to intro the programme.
I know on a forum that discusses TV Presentation people want to see a return to the old days of wide shot, lights down and music stab... but things move on!
(But don't worry - I'm sure in a few years it will all go full circle!)
itsrobert posted:
I hate this thing the BBC has about people switching over. First they started it on BBC World and then on the BBC One News. The outcome is that they've butchered the end of every news bulletin they produce! It's so disjointed and uncomfortable to watch. I'm sure an 8 second piece of music at the end of the news isn't going to make people switch over. Has the BBC ever thought that people will probably switch over no matter what they do? I mean, at 1930, I'm going to flick over to ITV for Coronation Street, no matter what the BBC does.
I'd hardly call it 'butchering' the end of every news broadcast. To me it makes sense to 'hand' to the regional news. I never understood why we ran a trail at 1830 and then had a regional symbol into the local news when we had opt out headlines at the top, for example. It's joined up television - and hopefully it flows. Is it really that bad that we've lost a wide shot and a move at the end of programmes?
I think that the BBC1 controller has a point - run your popular regional news late and the casual viewer that might channel surf may, just may, stay with you. I agree that the die hard Emmerdale or Corrie viewers wont, but he's not targeting them.
BBC Worlds so called 'invisible' opts are nothing to do with 'holding' viewers. They were introduced to prevent sting, after sting, after sting as the commercial breaks at different times on different streams were introduced. If they hadn't done that it would have looked rediculous if your stream was not opting out.
As for the presenters introducing the programme that was only decided because the Controller wanted Headlines at half past the hour... so it made sense for the presenter to intro the programme.
I know on a forum that discusses TV Presentation people want to see a return to the old days of wide shot, lights down and music stab... but things move on!
(But don't worry - I'm sure in a few years it will all go full circle!)