JK
There is now a backlash from the BBC News staff over the proposed cutting back of News at Ten.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
PE
One named person in that report.
Also This Week has lost Andrew Neil in part because he wanted to be on TV earlier. Again it's £9.99 is lower than £10, but 2335 seems a lot earlier than 2345.
Pete
Founding member
There is now a backlash from the BBC News staff over the proposed cutting back of News at Ten.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
One named person in that report.
Also This Week has lost Andrew Neil in part because he wanted to be on TV earlier. Again it's £9.99 is lower than £10, but 2335 seems a lot earlier than 2345.
TR
One named person in that report.
Also This Week has lost Andrew Neil in part because he wanted to be on TV earlier. Again it's £9.99 is lower than £10, but 2335 seems a lot earlier than 2345.
The Guardian has become very anti-BBC since Rusbridger left as editor. Its become a lefty Mail
There is now a backlash from the BBC News staff over the proposed cutting back of News at Ten.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
One named person in that report.
Also This Week has lost Andrew Neil in part because he wanted to be on TV earlier. Again it's £9.99 is lower than £10, but 2335 seems a lot earlier than 2345.
The Guardian has become very anti-BBC since Rusbridger left as editor. Its become a lefty Mail
BF
One named person in that report.
Also This Week has lost Andrew Neil in part because he wanted to be on TV earlier. Again it's £9.99 is lower than £10, but 2335 seems a lot earlier than 2345.
The Guardian has become very anti-BBC since Rusbridger left as editor. Its become a lefty Mail
Indeed some of the CIF articles wouldn’t look out of place in the Mail with how clickbaity they are
There is now a backlash from the BBC News staff over the proposed cutting back of News at Ten.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/feb/14/anger-over-bbc-plan-to-cut-news-at-ten-by-10-minutes
One named person in that report.
Also This Week has lost Andrew Neil in part because he wanted to be on TV earlier. Again it's £9.99 is lower than £10, but 2335 seems a lot earlier than 2345.
The Guardian has become very anti-BBC since Rusbridger left as editor. Its become a lefty Mail
Indeed some of the CIF articles wouldn’t look out of place in the Mail with how clickbaity they are
LS
Lou Scannon
What does CIF mean?
(Presumably not as in the cleaning product previously called Jif?!)
(Presumably not as in the cleaning product previously called Jif?!)
CU
Unless I was seeing things earlier this afternoon on BBC One, I believe there is now a trailer promoting the BBC Three portfolio of programmes on BBC One, Mondays - Wednesdays, after the News at Ten (although it doesn't refer to the time slot).
Full steam ahead with this, then.
Full steam ahead with this, then.
Last edited by Custard56 on 17 February 2019 5:45pm
DV
More rumbles, this time from
Dan Roan in a hastily deleted tweet, promoting his Gordon Banks Funeral report ...
Dan Roan
No room for this in the new shorter @BBCNews at 10 sadly, so any RTs appreciated
Dan Roan in a hastily deleted tweet, promoting his Gordon Banks Funeral report ...
Dan Roan
No room for this in the new shorter @BBCNews at 10 sadly, so any RTs appreciated