Unusual ending to the
One
today. Rather than the usual sign-off with a handover to the regions, they used the opportunity to show a 30-second sequence of stills from Haiti in complete silence. I thought the effect was quite dramatic.
Unusual ending to the
One
today. Rather than the usual sign-off with a handover to the regions, they used the opportunity to show a 30-second sequence of stills from Haiti in complete silence. I thought the effect was quite dramatic.
I'm sure you don't
really
mean that either sequence portrays anything particularly 'nice': more that they both have an informative and profound effect on the viewer, which is no doubt the intent of good journalism, both written, aural and video-based.
I'm sure you don't
really
mean that either sequence portrays anything particularly 'nice': more that they both have an informative and profound effect on the viewer, which is no doubt the intent of good journalism, both written, aural and video-based.
Um, all I meant was that the music adds to it really...
I think they're different things. The Haiti montage works better in silence to draw your attention to it; and to try to invoke some emotions in the viewer. War footage gets to have bombastic music to make it seem exciting. A media student would probably call it the grammar of news. See also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3BO6GP9NMY#t=2m51s
Has the Sunday night 10pm bulletin now been moved to 10.30pm permanently, it is on at the later time next week as well. Not long ago the Sunday 10pm bulletin was quite high profile and some on here classed it as a proper '10' bulletin.
I really wish they'd decide what they're calling the national bulletins. Today's evening bulletin was introduced by the announcer as "The Six o'clock News," yet we were welcomed by George to the "BBC News at 6," only for him to end saying he'd be back with the "BBC
's
News at 10." This whole "brand-strengthening" tactic really doesn't seem to be working. I know it's arguably minor, but it's pretty annoying.