I wasn't entirely sure where to put this, but I know some members asked long ago where the smart glass went and that it was removed because it lacked contrast. The photo above rather clearly explains what the issue was
In other news, this other photo I found online just after the builders finished, but before the fit-out just amazes me. Having been in there a few times the concept of seeing it empty is just weird now. The lack of carpet alone is odd, having accidentally ripped up a few of the carpet tiles already!
While the contrast of the smart glass doesn't look so great, I do wish that they had went with studio monitor graphics that were predominantly red/orange rather than white. The BBC didn't have this problem when it mostly had newsroom sets, but one thing CNN International circa 2006 and other U.S. networks have realized is that white doesn't always look good on studio displays, and it's better to go with something a little more colorful in order to avoid looking too washed out.
The idea being you can project onto it when its frosted and use a camera behind it when it's clear, that's why the tracks go around and behind the monitors now. A great idea in theory, alas not to practical in reality.
The idea being you can project onto it when its frosted and use a camera behind it when it's clear, that's why the tracks go around and behind the monitors now. A great idea in theory, alas not to practical in reality.
I'm fairly sure that the mid 90s sport set in TC5 had something like that, where the glass panel could be clear to show the production team behind the presenter for Grandstand or have graphics on it for other programmes.
Interestingly, in Steve Rider's autobiography there is a picture of the Grandstand studio which appears to be totally CSO, rather than the smart glass (see below). Was this taken whilst there was a temporary set, then?