WI
OK. 'here' should be 'hear'.
Now I haven't got the bug anymore.
Are you positive about that?
Yes.
I wouldn't be so sure.
You're right to be sceptical, anymore is another mistake. It's not one word but two. It should read 'any more'.
OK, fair enough.
Katherine posted:
Breakfast News posted:
winifred posted:
Marcus posted:
winifred posted:
dvboy posted:
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.
OK. 'here' should be 'hear'.
Now I haven't got the bug anymore.
Are you positive about that?
Yes.
I wouldn't be so sure.
You're right to be sceptical, anymore is another mistake. It's not one word but two. It should read 'any more'.
OK, fair enough.
GM
nodnirG kraM
winifred posted:
nodnirG kraM posted:
winifred posted:
If it were someone respectable such as Nelson Mandela, then I would understand your concern.
Just what the hell makes Nelson Mandela "respectable"??
I think that's a rhetorical question. I don't want to insult your intelligence.
Well while you're thinking of something, I'll make a cup of tea.
WI
Just what the hell makes Nelson Mandela "respectable"??
I think that's a rhetorical question. I don't want to insult your intelligence.
Well while you're thinking of something, I'll make a cup of tea.
Like I said, I think you were asking a rhetorical question.
nodnirG kraM posted:
winifred posted:
nodnirG kraM posted:
winifred posted:
If it were someone respectable such as Nelson Mandela, then I would understand your concern.
Just what the hell makes Nelson Mandela "respectable"??
I think that's a rhetorical question. I don't want to insult your intelligence.
Well while you're thinking of something, I'll make a cup of tea.
Like I said, I think you were asking a rhetorical question.
GM
nodnirG kraM
You obviously seem quite a fan of his ... just wondering why that's all.
WE
Winifred, What an ignorant person you are. First, it is hear -- not here -- George Bush. Second, he's the President of the United States. Nelson Mandela is no longer a president of anything. Also in his younger days he put bombs on buses. That's what I call terrorism.
Who cares? It's only that stupid brianless idiot George Bush. If it were someone respectable such as Nelson Mandela, then I would understand your concern.
Actually, if anything this is postive, the less people here of George 'idiot' Bush the better.
winifred posted:
dvboy posted:
Black screens all of a sudden at 2:55 on BBC News 24 while Bush babbles on about Iraq. Got it back before Katty Kay managed to finish her apology.
Highly impressed with the BBC coverage before the speech. Much better than Sky News where the guy presenting in London admitted on air that he hadn't a clue who many of the people walking into Congress ahead of the President were.
Highly impressed with the BBC coverage before the speech. Much better than Sky News where the guy presenting in London admitted on air that he hadn't a clue who many of the people walking into Congress ahead of the President were.
Winifred, What an ignorant person you are. First, it is hear -- not here -- George Bush. Second, he's the President of the United States. Nelson Mandela is no longer a president of anything. Also in his younger days he put bombs on buses. That's what I call terrorism.
Who cares? It's only that stupid brianless idiot George Bush. If it were someone respectable such as Nelson Mandela, then I would understand your concern.
Actually, if anything this is postive, the less people here of George 'idiot' Bush the better.
GM
nodnirG kraM
As terrorists go, I quite like that Bin Laden bloke. Perhaps Mandela's more of the People's Terrorist then.