The Newsroom

BBC loses feed during State of the Union address

(February 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
DV
dvboy
Black screens all of a sudden at 2:55 on BBC News 24 while Bush babbles on about Iraq. Got it back before Katty Kay managed to finish her apology.

Highly impressed with the BBC coverage before the speech. Much better than Sky News where the guy presenting in London admitted on air that he hadn't a clue who many of the people walking into Congress ahead of the President were.
WI
winifred
dvboy posted:
Black screens all of a sudden at 2:55 on BBC News 24 while Bush babbles on about Iraq. Got it back before Katty Kay managed to finish her apology.

Highly impressed with the BBC coverage before the speech. Much better than Sky News where the guy presenting in London admitted on air that he hadn't a clue who many of the people walking into Congress ahead of the President were.


Who cares? It's only that stupid brianless idiot George Bush. If it were someone respectable such as Nelson Mandela, then I would understand your concern.

Actually, if anything this is postive, the less people here of George 'idiot' Bush the better.
PE
Pete Founding member
Right see actually winnie, Bush may be an arse but he's a rather important one so generally important speeches by important arses do merit news coverage.
SP
Sput
winifred posted:
It's only that stupid brianless idiot George Bush.


Caught the bug too winifred?
WI
winifred
Sput posted:
winifred posted:
It's only that stupid brianless idiot George Bush.


Caught the bug too winifred?


Sorry, should have been spelt 'brainless'. Embarassed

See, I haven't got the George Bush bug anymore. Very Happy
DV
dvboy
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.
WI
winifred
dvboy posted:
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.


OK. 'here' should be 'hear'. Embarassed

Now I haven't got the bug anymore. Very Happy
MA
Marcus Founding member
winifred posted:
dvboy posted:
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.


OK. 'here' should be 'hear'. Embarassed

Now I haven't got the bug anymore. Very Happy


Are you positive about that?
WI
winifred
Marcus posted:
winifred posted:
dvboy posted:
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.


OK. 'here' should be 'hear'. Embarassed

Now I haven't got the bug anymore. Very Happy


Are you positive about that?


Yes.
BN
Breakfast News
winifred posted:
Marcus posted:
winifred posted:
dvboy posted:
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.


OK. 'here' should be 'hear'. Embarassed

Now I haven't got the bug anymore. Very Happy


Are you positive about that?


Yes.


I wouldn't be so sure.
KA
Katherine Founding member
Breakfast News posted:
winifred posted:
Marcus posted:
winifred posted:
dvboy posted:
I won't point out the other glaring error in your original post then.


OK. 'here' should be 'hear'. Embarassed

Now I haven't got the bug anymore. Very Happy


Are you positive about that?


Yes.


I wouldn't be so sure.


You're right to be sceptical, anymore is another mistake. It's not one word but two. It should read 'any more'.
GM
nodnirG kraM
winifred posted:
If it were someone respectable such as Nelson Mandela, then I would understand your concern.

Just what the hell makes Nelson Mandela "respectable"??

Newer posts