JA
Those comments are so stupid. All things considered the move to Salford has been very successful. Yes the set is a bit small and the backdrop looks terrible, but the concept remains the same. People who watched Breakfast when it was down in London still watch it when it's up in Salford. Nobody could watch Daybreak over this.
What she said about the presenters make no sense. They all have lots of experience presenting Breakfast and the team is stronger than ever.
There is some rubbish being spoken by viewers on Newswatch tonight regarding Breakfast in Salford. I can see absolutely no change in the programme bar the set, and I bet if the BBC hadn't told anybody they were moving, they would have been none the wiser. The viewers they've got on here are talking about Breakfast becoming a 'regional' programme because it's from Salford...where do they get these people from??
And as I was writing that, the best from one lady: "I think Sian Williams was much more serious than the new presenters. I just don't think they're good enough, with the exception of Bill Turnbull and Charlie Stayt." None of them are new presenters, and she's just said that half of them are at least just as good as Sian...
And as I was writing that, the best from one lady: "I think Sian Williams was much more serious than the new presenters. I just don't think they're good enough, with the exception of Bill Turnbull and Charlie Stayt." None of them are new presenters, and she's just said that half of them are at least just as good as Sian...
Those comments are so stupid. All things considered the move to Salford has been very successful. Yes the set is a bit small and the backdrop looks terrible, but the concept remains the same. People who watched Breakfast when it was down in London still watch it when it's up in Salford. Nobody could watch Daybreak over this.
What she said about the presenters make no sense. They all have lots of experience presenting Breakfast and the team is stronger than ever.