The Newsroom

BBC Breakfast

New-look programme launches Monday; see p245 > (January 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
NE
Newsroom
Its Definite that Natasha has got the Six........ just found this. Mirror article

Broadcast are saying Mishal has Breakfast, which leaves Sian - in limbo! It aint on!!!!! Very upset
ST
Stuart
Noooooooooooo, bring back Sian & Bill I say! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
DJ
David Jonathan
Newsroom posted:
Its Definite that Natasha has got the Six........ just found this. Mirror article

Broadcast are saying Mishal has Breakfast, which leaves Sian - in limbo! It aint on!!!!! Very upset

Natasha's profile and picture have disappeared from the Breakfast website today. So the chance that she will return to the programme is little, I think.
CT
ctb
Slightly OT but that Mirror article is typical tabloid journalism:

An insider said: "We're very happy with the new arrangement, and we're sure the viewers will be too - especially the men."
MO
Moz
ctb posted:
that Mirror article is typical tabloid journalism

More shock news coming into us now...

Bears sh*t in the woods!

The Pope is Catholic!

I like beer!

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41384000/jpg/_41384344_breakfast_banner_629.jpg

I like this quote from Dermott...

Quote:
Since joining Breakfast in September 2002, Dermot says he's discovered it's like no other programme he's ever worked on.

Yes, because before he used to work on the news!
R2
r2ro
I agree that Natasha should be moved off of Breakfast as she has been doing so well on the Six. I'm a little disappointed that Mishal is going to be permanent as I feel that Sian is better and more suited for the weekday Breakfast programme with Mishal better for the weekend. To me it would make more sense, if the presenters had to remain the same, to have Bill and Sian (Mon-Thurs) then Dermot and Mishal (Fri-Sun). I'd say this as the latter two are clearly suited to a more newsier programme than weekday Breakfast is.
JO
johnnybegood
r2ro posted:
I agree that Natasha should be moved off of Breakfast as she has been doing so well on the Six. I'm a little disappointed that Mishal is going to be permanent as I feel that Sian is better and more suited for the weekday Breakfast programme with Mishal better for the weekend. To me it would make more sense, if the presenters had to remain the same, to have Bill and Sian (Mon-Thurs) then Dermot and Mishal (Fri-Sun). I'd say this as the latter two are clearly suited to a more newsier programme than weekday Breakfast is.


Maybe Sian did not want the weekday gig? It might not be a case of bosses shunting her for Mishal.
NE
Newsroom
I would have thought she's well peeved that Natasha got the six. I can't imagine where she's gonna fit into the new line up.

Still unfilled is Sophie's understudy
Natasha's understudy
Mishal's understudy

Wasn't Bill returning to the field????
LO
LONDON
Newsroom posted:
I would have thought she's well peeved that Natasha got the six. I can't imagine where she's gonna fit into the new line up.

Still unfilled is Sophie's understudy
Natasha's understudy
Mishal's understudy

Wasn't Bill returning to the field????


I think the problem is the way she gets on with Bill. She presents really well with him, and they do have great onscreen chemisty, this is apparent by the amount of times that this chemistry is spoken about on this forum. From what i have seen the chemistry between Sian and Dermot is not quite the same, the same can be said between Mishal and Bill. The BBC cannot dump Dermot on the weekend shift of Breakfast, because he was the big poach for the BBC from ITV, and his contract probably specifies that he will be the main presenter of Breakfast. Therfore as they cannot, sideline Dermot, and the great chemistry between Sian and Bill, it would seem logical for the BBC to choose Mishal over Sian.
IT
itsrobert Founding member
johnnybegood posted:
r2ro posted:
I agree that Natasha should be moved off of Breakfast as she has been doing so well on the Six. I'm a little disappointed that Mishal is going to be permanent as I feel that Sian is better and more suited for the weekday Breakfast programme with Mishal better for the weekend. To me it would make more sense, if the presenters had to remain the same, to have Bill and Sian (Mon-Thurs) then Dermot and Mishal (Fri-Sun). I'd say this as the latter two are clearly suited to a more newsier programme than weekday Breakfast is.


Maybe Sian did not want the weekday gig? It might not be a case of bosses shunting her for Mishal.


Indeed, the thing that annoys me most about this forum is that people treat presenters as pieces in a board game. It's as if all decisions have some ulterior motive and that they all come from the management. As you said, Sian may have been offered the main job but turned it down. She may have family commitments which prevent her from presenting the programme all week every week or she might just like being the weekend/relief presenter.

Congratulations to Mishal, though. I've watched her on BBC World for several years (indeed, from her days as a business presenter) and always knew she was destined for a domestic programme. It'll be a shame for BBC World, though, as she was a very capable presenter.
NR
Norma
Where is it confirmed Mishal is going to be Natasha's replacement - or is this just speculation? Sian's bio is now where Kurplunsky's was and her face is next to Dermot's on the website. What should be read into that?
LO
LONDON
Norma posted:
Where is it confirmed Mishal is going to be Natasha's replacement - or is this just speculation? Sian's bio is now where Kurplunsky's was and her face is next to Dermot's on the website. What should be read into that?


If Mishal is Natasha's replacement, she is not going to be able to start presenting Breakfast full time until January next year, when she has returned from Maternity Leave.

Newer posts