Sian - studied at Oxford Polytechnic (now called Oxford Brookes ''University'').
Natasha - studied at the University of Oxford.
What rubbish... Can we all grow up a bit?
I'm not going to get into a "Sian v Natasha" argument because I like and rate them both as presenters. They are different - but what is wrong with that?
I don't want a regiment of identical clones presenting, I want varied, normal, rounded people who can cope with a variety of topics, having gravitas and background knowledge of situations when required, but also appearing human and having a personality that breaks through at other times. (You can tell a lot about a presenter by how they approach mistakes and technical problems)
I think both Sian and Natasha have those abilities - and I enjoy watching both of them.
What University you went to is not entirely relevant to your broadcasting abilities, and is not particularly relevant to a broadcast career as much these days (I should know I went to "the other place". A nice 3 year break from the real world - but it was just that.)
Sian is a very well qualified and experienced journalist - and was due to be one of News 24's launch editors in 1997 (a senior editorial post) before she was persuaded to move in front of the cameras. She is still certainly a very competent and talented journalist.
Natasha is obviously a thoroughly competent and flexible presenter as well.
Don't see a need to play them off against each other - why waste the time and energy...