EO
Why?
Ha Ha!! because it's a geeky thing to do and that's why we're all on this forum!!
Yeah, but there's geekiness and then there's geekiness. This forum is primarily concerned with titles, graphics and studios. Most people here will be able to tell you when Breakfast News became Breakfast, its various set changes, when it moved to N6 etc... Some wish to talk about presenters aswell. That's fine. The aforementioned majority will be able to tell you about presenters of Breakfast and Breakfast News back to the 1980s, when Bowen and Raworth were replaced by Murnaghan and Kaplinsky, and various stand-ins down through the years. This in and of itself is tremendously geeky, and I am unashamedly part of it.
But what you are suggesting tips the balance firmly into the territory of OCD. Please don't pursue it. It's not interesting.
salfordjohn posted:
pickle104 posted:
salfordjohn posted:
How about this?
Keep a track on here of who presented the programme every day this year ?
Tue 1st ?
Wed 2nd ?
Thu 3rd ?
Fri 4th ?
Sat 5th - Charlie & Susanna
Sun 6th - Charlie & Susanna
Mon 7th - Bill & Sian
Tue 8th Bill & Sian
Keep a track on here of who presented the programme every day this year ?
Tue 1st ?
Wed 2nd ?
Thu 3rd ?
Fri 4th ?
Sat 5th - Charlie & Susanna
Sun 6th - Charlie & Susanna
Mon 7th - Bill & Sian
Tue 8th Bill & Sian
Why?
Ha Ha!! because it's a geeky thing to do and that's why we're all on this forum!!
Yeah, but there's geekiness and then there's geekiness. This forum is primarily concerned with titles, graphics and studios. Most people here will be able to tell you when Breakfast News became Breakfast, its various set changes, when it moved to N6 etc... Some wish to talk about presenters aswell. That's fine. The aforementioned majority will be able to tell you about presenters of Breakfast and Breakfast News back to the 1980s, when Bowen and Raworth were replaced by Murnaghan and Kaplinsky, and various stand-ins down through the years. This in and of itself is tremendously geeky, and I am unashamedly part of it.
But what you are suggesting tips the balance firmly into the territory of OCD. Please don't pursue it. It's not interesting.