SP
Breakfast does, however have the word 'News' on its title s , so it's fair to expect a decent amount of news in the programme.
Personally, I find the mix about right, although I tend to watch between about 7 and 7.30 which is much more newsy than say, 8.30-9... although at that time you've got the option of News 24.
Work of Artifice posted:
On Sunday's
Points Of View
, there was an item about the amount of "un-news" on Breakfast (e.g. reports about toast landing butter side down or not, etc).
As part of Eammon Holmes' intro on POV, he said something to the effect of "a lack of real news, in a programme with "News" in it's title"
Has the POV script-writer (or, indeed, the complainers) not noticed that the Breakfast programme actually doesn't have the word "News" in it's title, and hasn't had since about the start of this decade?
So, presumably the Breakfast programme is officially handled as being "news-based", yet a certain amount of more "feature-y" stuff doesn't break its mission statement.
Taking the above into account, completely invalidates the entire POV item. I get the impression that things like POV, NewsWatch etc have to make a story out of nothing, to fill time.
As part of Eammon Holmes' intro on POV, he said something to the effect of "a lack of real news, in a programme with "News" in it's title"
Has the POV script-writer (or, indeed, the complainers) not noticed that the Breakfast programme actually doesn't have the word "News" in it's title, and hasn't had since about the start of this decade?
Taking the above into account, completely invalidates the entire POV item. I get the impression that things like POV, NewsWatch etc have to make a story out of nothing, to fill time.
Breakfast does, however have the word 'News' on its title s , so it's fair to expect a decent amount of news in the programme.
Personally, I find the mix about right, although I tend to watch between about 7 and 7.30 which is much more newsy than say, 8.30-9... although at that time you've got the option of News 24.