On Sunday's
Points Of View
, there was an item about the amount of "un-news" on Breakfast (e.g. reports about toast landing butter side down or not, etc).
As part of Eammon Holmes' intro on POV, he said something to the effect of "a lack of real news, in a programme with "News" in it's title"
Has the POV script-writer (or, indeed, the complainers) not noticed that the Breakfast programme actually
doesn't
have the word "News" in it's title, and hasn't had since about the start of this decade?

So, presumably the Breakfast programme is officially handled as being "news-based", yet a certain amount of more "feature-y" stuff doesn't break its mission statement.
Taking the above into account, completely invalidates the entire POV item. I get the impression that things like POV, NewsWatch etc have to make a story out of nothing, to fill time.