NG
That just doesn't seem like a good proposition for viewers though. 7 different candidates talking for possibly several hours. I can't see it working if they go ahead with it.
Happens in lots of other countries in Europe like Sweden and Denmark... However they normally stage more than one debate - and concentrate them in policy areas. So you get an Economic debate, a Foreign Policy debate etc. and they don't just concentrate on the party leaders, though there ARE leader debates.
To be honest I think it works much better - you get decent discussion about issues with people who are across them - and actually find out a bit more about the party policy. Feels a bit more 'grown up' than our point-scoring exercises...
noggin
Founding member
It's clear that the more members the longer each of the debates will have to be. Two hours simply isn't enough.
That just doesn't seem like a good proposition for viewers though. 7 different candidates talking for possibly several hours. I can't see it working if they go ahead with it.
Happens in lots of other countries in Europe like Sweden and Denmark... However they normally stage more than one debate - and concentrate them in policy areas. So you get an Economic debate, a Foreign Policy debate etc. and they don't just concentrate on the party leaders, though there ARE leader debates.
To be honest I think it works much better - you get decent discussion about issues with people who are across them - and actually find out a bit more about the party policy. Feels a bit more 'grown up' than our point-scoring exercises...