So seeing as we've got to review something here, I suppose I'll review the video you posted in your signature. You probably won't even read this, but hey, you wouldn't read it even if I posted anything else, so here we go.
This is where the controversy begins.. Mainly about Office for Mac 2011 and where I got it from..
No one cared where you got it from. You brought up where you got it from ("somewhere online"), and then people wondered why you had brought it up in the first place.
Proof that I purchased Office for Mac 2011...
We don't really care if you purchased it, got it off The Pirate Bay, or got it from a mystic sea turtle, we'd just like to see a mock that'd look nice on screen.
Neil Jones, dbl, and many others on the website were the people who gave 'rude' and 'negative' feedback.
Oh no, the negativity of... constructive criticism? Neil in particular was trying to help you through both of your mocks. But instead of taking the criticism, running with it, and making the mock better, you got "so fed up" and eventually left the site because of all the "rude" and "negative" feedback that was just trying to help you make your mocks better.
The site may be based in the UK.
Really? I thought it was based in Zanzibar. Typical American ignorance for you, I suppose.
Anyways, that video (and my post, because I'm self-grading) gets a 2/5 because it doesn't really showcase the mock all that well.
Graphic designer. Electronic idiot.