DT
God this is tedious now. Aaron_2015 clearly only wants feedback that fits his view of the mock. None of the comments on here are inexcusable, all are perfectly valid comments. The difference between Lee's mock and yours is the time, effort, ideas, realisation, design and quality.
Time and effort: Judging by the fact that Critique was able to whip up the same mock in minutes does suggest that time and effort aren't really in play her.
Ideas: Your idea is the GMB graphics recreated with one thing essentially changed - the ITV seat ticker which was located there to ensure continuity between the ITV and GMB coverage.
Realisation/Quality: Quite frankly this could be done in PowerPoint with the same aesthetic quality.
Design: Most of the design was someone elses and you named this an improvement of which it isn't. The one feature that you have changed was put there intentionally by the original designers - either design a new package or don't change it.
No doubt this post is totally inexcusable for pointing out your own hypocrisies and bad manners. If you want feedback then take it, many have already given you similar feedback.
Time and effort: Judging by the fact that Critique was able to whip up the same mock in minutes does suggest that time and effort aren't really in play her.
Ideas: Your idea is the GMB graphics recreated with one thing essentially changed - the ITV seat ticker which was located there to ensure continuity between the ITV and GMB coverage.
Realisation/Quality: Quite frankly this could be done in PowerPoint with the same aesthetic quality.
Design: Most of the design was someone elses and you named this an improvement of which it isn't. The one feature that you have changed was put there intentionally by the original designers - either design a new package or don't change it.
No doubt this post is totally inexcusable for pointing out your own hypocrisies and bad manners. If you want feedback then take it, many have already given you similar feedback.