JO
Usually you create the thread at the same time as posting the images.
I am signing up for Metropol, the images will be here soon! Check back in 10 mins..
Usually you create the thread at the same time as posting the images.
SR
Is that the 007 Stage at Pinewood?!
Flercch... This is why I hate Studio Mocks.
Tips for improvement:
1. IMAGINARY STUDIOS ARE BAD - There are many REAL and EXISTING studios in the world that could house your show, dont make one up. Your mock has to have some grounding in reality.
2. Get the studio dimensions - some production facilities offer downloadable studio plans from their website to aid with Set design.
3. Be realistic - no stupidly oversized studios for a show which has historically had a small studio and likely couldn't afford something bigger under its budget.
4. Look at your work - this quite obviously is a pile of crap and if you cant see that for yourself there really is no hope for you.
1/5
Flercch... This is why I hate Studio Mocks.
Tips for improvement:
1. IMAGINARY STUDIOS ARE BAD - There are many REAL and EXISTING studios in the world that could house your show, dont make one up. Your mock has to have some grounding in reality.
2. Get the studio dimensions - some production facilities offer downloadable studio plans from their website to aid with Set design.
3. Be realistic - no stupidly oversized studios for a show which has historically had a small studio and likely couldn't afford something bigger under its budget.
4. Look at your work - this quite obviously is a pile of crap and if you cant see that for yourself there really is no hope for you.
1/5
BA
This is clearly 5 minutes' worth of work in SketchUp - it looks as if you designed the set, wanted some fish tanks for some reason, and then had to fill the space because you hadn't considered the scale.
Not only is this an awful set mock, but it's a lazy one too. A mock of this kind needs research of the programme, comparable sets, and studios, a lot of practice, and a lot of legwork. If you are missing any of those components, or any other important advice outlined in previous posts, your mock is going to be awful.
Obviously, there are key things to consider with other types of mocks, but this type is one that requires a lot of steps.
Not only is this an awful set mock, but it's a lazy one too. A mock of this kind needs research of the programme, comparable sets, and studios, a lot of practice, and a lot of legwork. If you are missing any of those components, or any other important advice outlined in previous posts, your mock is going to be awful.
Obviously, there are key things to consider with other types of mocks, but this type is one that requires a lot of steps.
MD
Martin Dean
This is clearly 5 minutes' worth of work in SketchUp - it looks as if you designed the set, wanted some fish tanks for some reason, and then had to fill the space because you hadn't considered the scale.
Not only is this an awful set mock, but it's a lazy one too. A mock of this kind needs research of the programme, comparable sets, and studios, a lot of practice, and a lot of legwork. If you are missing any of those components, or any other important advice outlined in previous posts, your mock is going to be awful.
Obviously, there are key things to consider with other types of mocks, but this type is one that requires a lot of steps.
Not only is this an awful set mock, but it's a lazy one too. A mock of this kind needs research of the programme, comparable sets, and studios, a lot of practice, and a lot of legwork. If you are missing any of those components, or any other important advice outlined in previous posts, your mock is going to be awful.
Obviously, there are key things to consider with other types of mocks, but this type is one that requires a lot of steps.
Well I am telling you now, that it took more than 5 minutes! It took me more like 5 hours, I worked to put this together and have it all in a good way, but obviously you snobs on this forum don't like people. You know what, GET OUT MORE STOP SITTING ON NERDY FORUMS!
Also on another subject someone said "Don't make mocks based on a new design" well why not? I was trying to give the show a new look. Also I have to agree with size and stuff.
BA
Well I am telling you now, that it took more than 5 minutes! It took me more like 5 hours, I worked to put this together and have it all in a good way, but obviously you snobs on this forum don't like people. You know what, GET OUT MORE STOP SITTING ON NERDY FORUMS!
That's why I said 5 minutes' worth. You're nowhere near proficient enough with SketchUp if you took 5 hours to produce what you did.
Clearly your delusion is getting in the way of your sense of reality in terms of this mock, so I don't think it's worth giving you more constructive criticism.
It's also nice to see that programmes like The X-Factor do, in some ways, reflect reality when there are members here who cannot take constructive criticism, and reply with petulant insults.
This is clearly 5 minutes' worth of work in SketchUp - it looks as if you designed the set, wanted some fish tanks for some reason, and then had to fill the space because you hadn't considered the scale.
Not only is this an awful set mock, but it's a lazy one too. A mock of this kind needs research of the programme, comparable sets, and studios, a lot of practice, and a lot of legwork. If you are missing any of those components, or any other important advice outlined in previous posts, your mock is going to be awful.
Obviously, there are key things to consider with other types of mocks, but this type is one that requires a lot of steps.
Not only is this an awful set mock, but it's a lazy one too. A mock of this kind needs research of the programme, comparable sets, and studios, a lot of practice, and a lot of legwork. If you are missing any of those components, or any other important advice outlined in previous posts, your mock is going to be awful.
Obviously, there are key things to consider with other types of mocks, but this type is one that requires a lot of steps.
Well I am telling you now, that it took more than 5 minutes! It took me more like 5 hours, I worked to put this together and have it all in a good way, but obviously you snobs on this forum don't like people. You know what, GET OUT MORE STOP SITTING ON NERDY FORUMS!
That's why I said 5 minutes' worth. You're nowhere near proficient enough with SketchUp if you took 5 hours to produce what you did.
Clearly your delusion is getting in the way of your sense of reality in terms of this mock, so I don't think it's worth giving you more constructive criticism.
It's also nice to see that programmes like The X-Factor do, in some ways, reflect reality when there are members here who cannot take constructive criticism, and reply with petulant insults.
MD
Martin Dean
So you're telling someone to stop using a 'nerdy forum' from the same 'nerdy forum'? People aren't criticising you because they're 'snobs' or because they don't like people, but because this is truly terrible.
And god help us if this was the product of five hours' work.
And god help us if this was the product of five hours' work.
Okay, I don't sit on this forum all day like most of you guys do, all youse do is sit and watch TV from the thought I got! And yes you are all snobs as I gave some work and it wasn't good enough for your standards, therefore you expect a lot, your all posh snobs. Also yes it wasn't 5 hours it was 1 hour, after I had a break for a while.

