GE
I thought it would be used to advertise the channel's programming, like the way that Sky bases their idents on their shows. However, I now can see that it may upset people.
JA
james
I thought it would be used to advertise the channel's programming, like the way that Sky bases their idents on their shows. However, I now can see that it may upset people.
Sorry, but that's plain weird.
JO
Disturb
people would be a better way of putting it. How could you arrive at the conclusion that would look ok? I could ask why you chose those two sample programmes in particular but we'll leave it there.
Graphic snapshots of human slaughter aside, Sky1 is *the worst* channel you could have chosen as your base. But I'm more inclined to think you're using it as a handy excuse to cover the fact you've done nothing more than slap text on an image. A lovely, lovely image.
Disturbingly bad. Badly disturbing. Take your pick.
Graphic snapshots of human slaughter aside, Sky1 is *the worst* channel you could have chosen as your base. But I'm more inclined to think you're using it as a handy excuse to cover the fact you've done nothing more than slap text on an image. A lovely, lovely image.
Disturbingly bad. Badly disturbing. Take your pick.
VM
Realistically this channel's main aim would be to make a profit right? You're basically using an image of one of the worst catastrophies the world has ever seen to make profit.
Just think before you post.
I just look at that image and think of a two second breakbumper of a plane crashing into a building with hundreds of people being killed instantly on both the plane and the building - with your logo on top. Not really the best idea is it?
I thought it would be used to advertise the channel's programming, like the way that Sky bases their idents on their shows. However, I now can see that it may upset people.
Realistically this channel's main aim would be to make a profit right? You're basically using an image of one of the worst catastrophies the world has ever seen to make profit.
Just think before you post.
I just look at that image and think of a two second breakbumper of a plane crashing into a building with hundreds of people being killed instantly on both the plane and the building - with your logo on top. Not really the best idea is it?
GE
What about this for a new logo?
http://i1260.photobucket.com/albums/ii571/littlebish/NEWLOGO.png
http://i1260.photobucket.com/albums/ii571/littlebish/NEWLOGO.png
AG
AllanGalb
I think my Dad would love this channel 
SR
Fictional
TV Channel Graphics Pack
::facepalm::
I thought the point of mocks was to show off your graphics skills and design ideas for entities that actually exist... e.g. "Designing a new set of titles for BBC Breakfast because they are moving to Salford", or "Creating a 3D realistic recreation of the BidTV studio in Sketchup", or "A set of Graphics to show what Grampian would be like if they had stayed independent".
NOT... "Here are some graphics for my Fictional TV Derp Derp Derp..."
I cannot tell you how much I despise these Fictional TV Channel Graphics.
Now George... Stop this Madness in the name of Your King... before I piss myself.
::facepalm::
I thought the point of mocks was to show off your graphics skills and design ideas for entities that actually exist... e.g. "Designing a new set of titles for BBC Breakfast because they are moving to Salford", or "Creating a 3D realistic recreation of the BidTV studio in Sketchup", or "A set of Graphics to show what Grampian would be like if they had stayed independent".
NOT... "Here are some graphics for my Fictional TV Derp Derp Derp..."
I cannot tell you how much I despise these Fictional TV Channel Graphics.
Now George... Stop this Madness in the name of Your King... before I piss myself.