Just play the 2.11 recording twice in succession. You'll get the same effect
Hardly!, and if you think that's the case then you've not listened fully the the longer start up music to which I'm referring.
:-(
A former member
If it's the 4.25 recording in the video on the previous page, then it is definitely the same track played twice in succession - just with the end of the first and start of the second quite badly overlaid/edited together. You can open the two in separate players and play them side by side.
However, if you can reference another video with a different track, I'd be very happy to hear it.
[quote="Andrew Wood" pid="841747"]If it's the 4.25 recording in the video on the previous page, then it is definitely the same track played twice in succession - just with the end of the first and start of the second quite badly overlaid/edited together. You can open the two in separate players and play them side by side.
Last edited by wheator on 6 September 2012 11:24pm
If you listen, the first part doesn't come to an end and promptly edited to the 2nd part, it has an integral middle part as well /quote]
Never said it came to an end, just badly edited together as to my ears it's a bit of a mess at the junction.
Well I don't agree its badly edited - It's a complete piece of work, not edited at all.
It is though just the 2 min loop (as stated above no 4 min version outright, it was just a loop extension)
Thanks for posting this badly edited version, unfortunately the official 4'25" version (or thereabouts), is different in the middle section - this is just a very bad edit at this point.
