TV
A number of factors contributed to the change of host. The switch was publicised on the site for two main reasons:
(a) the DNS update would have resulted in disruption to the site over a 48 hour period; visitors would probably have experienced switching between the old and new IPs as well as disruption to the site's e-mail service.
(b) if pages or images were suddenly missing, readers would be aware of a possible cause.
I'm sorry to hear that some readers are not keen on the revised menu system. However, these changes were implemented in response to criticism of the site's navigation and menu structure. I am taking these latest comments on board; some minor adjustments may appear in the coming weeks.
With respect to the HTML: yes, Front Page is used in the construction of most pages. I do accept that Front Page does add a lot of unnecessary code and indeed spaces it out in a rather ludicrous manner. However, Front Page allows me to package updates very quickly; it's much easier than manually coding the HTML. I don't believe the inclusion of what could be classed as redundant code in the HTML is really that big a deal though. The site's front page is in the region of 50k, yes. However, when that page is downloaded on to the PC for the first time (c. 15 secs on a 56k modem) and all the channel images have been cached, subsequent page downloads take less than 5 secs on a 56k modem. In terms of typical front pages, that's pretty good.
On the subject of dates for particular updates: any date I provide in response to a particular query is a 'best guess'. Updates to the site are always subject to what my personal circumstances permit. As already pointed out, it is a hobby site.
(a) the DNS update would have resulted in disruption to the site over a 48 hour period; visitors would probably have experienced switching between the old and new IPs as well as disruption to the site's e-mail service.
(b) if pages or images were suddenly missing, readers would be aware of a possible cause.
I'm sorry to hear that some readers are not keen on the revised menu system. However, these changes were implemented in response to criticism of the site's navigation and menu structure. I am taking these latest comments on board; some minor adjustments may appear in the coming weeks.
With respect to the HTML: yes, Front Page is used in the construction of most pages. I do accept that Front Page does add a lot of unnecessary code and indeed spaces it out in a rather ludicrous manner. However, Front Page allows me to package updates very quickly; it's much easier than manually coding the HTML. I don't believe the inclusion of what could be classed as redundant code in the HTML is really that big a deal though. The site's front page is in the region of 50k, yes. However, when that page is downloaded on to the PC for the first time (c. 15 secs on a 56k modem) and all the channel images have been cached, subsequent page downloads take less than 5 secs on a 56k modem. In terms of typical front pages, that's pretty good.
On the subject of dates for particular updates: any date I provide in response to a particular query is a 'best guess'. Updates to the site are always subject to what my personal circumstances permit. As already pointed out, it is a hobby site.