ED
It's clear the videos are a secondary issue, or may not actually be that much of an issue at all. If it were, surely a DMCA notice or similar would be the route they would have taken, no?
I believe if the site was not named Sky Idents there would not have been a problem, after all there are hundreds of clips of Sky presentation on You Tube at the moment which don't have any issues. The combination of Sky presentation clips on a website called Sky Idents stuck out to Sky's Content Protection department. I will PM both of you with more details.
Somebody in some office somewhere gets a pat on the back. What have they achieved? Not very much.
What revenue was lost? (After all, that's all a court can award for copyright infringement, and is surely the purpose of such a maneuver?) None.
Sad sign of the times.
What revenue was lost? (After all, that's all a court can award for copyright infringement, and is surely the purpose of such a maneuver?) None.
Sad sign of the times.
The main issue was the name 'Sky Idents'
. This is more a trademark than a copyright dispute. All the Sky pages have now been removed as a precautionary measure and will not return until the dispute is resolved.
It's clear the videos are a secondary issue, or may not actually be that much of an issue at all. If it were, surely a DMCA notice or similar would be the route they would have taken, no?
I believe if the site was not named Sky Idents there would not have been a problem, after all there are hundreds of clips of Sky presentation on You Tube at the moment which don't have any issues. The combination of Sky presentation clips on a website called Sky Idents stuck out to Sky's Content Protection department. I will PM both of you with more details.