Anyone would think he's the world's best radio presenter and/or voiceover artist. Sadly, for the increasingly self-delusional JM, he's not.
I'm also rather interested to know why he is so irate about Neon radio. It's got absolutely sod all to do with him, and I think many of Neon's listeners enjoyed the unique style of broadcasting. Just because it didn't conform to the horribly sterile, repetitive and mundane world of commercial, student and especially Internet radio generally, he see's it as an excuse to let rip.
Radio is about entertaining and informing people. Not just having some dimwit with a naff voice blathering on about which celebrity has been seen snogging another celebrity. As I said, many people enjoyed Neon's output - it was different at the very least, and should be commended for breaking away from the sickly world of your kind of radio, James.
Point taken MrT. Though I feel that I should refer you to Salty's previous comment, regarding what he feels that "The Head of Playlists at Source FM" is. I may not have been mentioned, however it is very common knowledge that I am the holder of this job title.
I am sure that my station doesn't want to do anybody for liabel however I think it is in the best interests of both TV Forum and Source FM that the post is removed.
Point taken MrT. Though I feel that I should refer you to Salty's previous comment, regarding what he feels that "The Head of Playlists at Source FM" is. I may not have been mentioned, however it is very common knowledge that I am the holder of this job title.
I am sure that my station doesn't want to do anybody for liabel however I think it is in the best interests of both TV Forum and Source FM that the post is removed.
Sod off *pretty please*
No actually, quick, best delete that post, I fear the worst when JM says he'll take legal action because someone called him a "nobber". Although saying that, I'm sure I read "JM is a nobber" on the back of a toilet door at Forton service station. Not 100% sure though.
Where did the extra 'a' come from in 'libel', Mr. Martin? Perhaps your oversized ego dropped it in there. Do us all a favour, James, and jump off a cliff.
Point taken MrT. Though I feel that I should refer you to Salty's previous comment, regarding what he feels that "The Head of Playlists at Source FM" is. I may not have been mentioned, however it is very common knowledge that I am the holder of this job title.
I had no idea that this person was you, I was merely passing on a message from a friend of these forums (who’s name will not be revealed), my apologies.
I have no idea who you are, and I have no idea what SourceFM is (cue a funny comment about it being a radio station). My comment did not make any comment regarding the station itself, it's output or it's workings - it was a personal comment connected to the Head of Playlists. This means that SourceFM doesn’t have a leg to stand on in any court, even if they could afford the costs (which I very much doubt any student station could do).
If you still feel that you should take TV Forum to court because someone called you a "nobber", go ahead. They judge will be laughing just as much as we are.
Point taken MrT. Though I feel that I should refer you to Salty's previous comment, regarding what he feels that "The Head of Playlists at Source FM" is. I may not have been mentioned, however it is very common knowledge that I am the holder of this job title.
I had no idea that this person was you, I was merely passing on a message from a friend of these forums (who’s name will not be revealed), my apologies.
I have no idea who you are, and I have no idea what SourceFM is (cue a funny comment about it being a radio station). My comment did not make any comment regarding the station itself, it's output or it's workings - it was a personal comment connected to the Head of Playlists. This means that SourceFM doesn’t have a leg to stand on in any court, even if they could afford the costs (which I very much doubt any student station could do).
If you still feel that you should take TV Forum to court because someone called you a "nobber", go ahead. They judge will be laughing just as much as we are.
Again, my apologies.
Well there's only one person here who knew me personally when I took up the job so that ain't difficult.
What a cheek James - really I'm quite surprised...
Point taken MrT. Though I feel that I should refer you to Salty's previous comment, regarding what he feels that "The Head of Playlists at Source FM" is. I may not have been mentioned, however it is very common knowledge that I am the holder of this job title.
I had no idea that this person was you, I was merely passing on a message from a friend of these forums (who’s name will not be revealed), my apologies.
I have no idea who you are, and I have no idea what SourceFM is (cue a funny comment about it being a radio station). My comment did not make any comment regarding the station itself, it's output or it's workings - it was a personal comment connected to the Head of Playlists. This means that SourceFM doesn’t have a leg to stand on in any court, even if they could afford the costs (which I very much doubt any student station could do).
If you still feel that you should take TV Forum to court because someone called you a "******", go ahead. They judge will be laughing just as much as we are.
Again, my apologies.
Well there's only one person here who knew me personally when I took up the job so that ain't difficult.
What a cheek James - really I'm quite surprised...