Media Websites

Mocks on Youtube that shouldn't be online...

...because they are so dreadful it's unreal. Mockers blame Saville and BBC for coverup (November 2009)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
SR
SomeRandomStuff
So this is your idea of a humorous parody?

I would call it an appalling travesty.
LE
levaniX_4
So this is your idea of a humorous parody?

I would call it an appalling travesty.


Well, have you seen original parody by dars-dm?
Original piece of rubbish: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LrWKrarFNCo

So, this is so terrible, awful, embarrasing and ridicilous (with that shouting)that we thought why not mock it
Also, the thing is that we pronounce russian words over and over again like they're English ones
(for example, mine-Ram, 2nd parody-Boar, 3rd parody-watering can)

And then, misreading abbreviation of the bbc by purpose. that's the idea.

I tried to create it as awful and ridilous as possible.
That was intended to be terrible and awfully made.

Because it's a parody of the parody, but not a serious quality mock.
Last edited by levaniX_4 on 18 February 2013 8:19pm
SR
SomeRandomStuff
So this is your idea of a humorous parody?

I would call it an appalling travesty.


Well, have you seen original parody by dars-dm?
Original piece of rubbish: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LrWKrarFNCo

So, this is so terrible, awful, embarrasing and ridicilous (with that shouting)that we thought why not mock it
Also, the thing is that we pronounce russian words over and over again like they're English ones
(for example, mine-Ram, 2nd parody-Boar, 3rd parody-watering can)

And then, misreading abbreviation of the bbc by purpose. that's the idea.

I tried to create it as awful and ridilous as possible.
That was intended to be terrible and awfully made.

Because it's a parody of the parody, but not a serious quality mock.


You're wasting time trying to explain this 'joke' its quite obviously not funny in the slightest.

...and I'm pretty sure the purpose of this thread is to point out terrible mocks... not to add to them.
LE
levaniX_4
So this is your idea of a humorous parody?

I would call it an appalling travesty.


Well, have you seen original parody by dars-dm?
Original piece of rubbish: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LrWKrarFNCo

So, this is so terrible, awful, embarrasing and ridicilous (with that shouting)that we thought why not mock it
Also, the thing is that we pronounce russian words over and over again like they're English ones
(for example, mine-Ram, 2nd parody-Boar, 3rd parody-watering can)

And then, misreading abbreviation of the bbc by purpose. that's the idea.

I tried to create it as awful and ridilous as possible.
That was intended to be terrible and awfully made.

Because it's a parody of the parody, but not a serious quality mock.


You're wasting time trying to explain this 'joke' its quite obviously not funny in the slightest.

...and I'm pretty sure the purpose of this thread is to point out terrible mocks... not to add to them.


Ok, that's all. I confess that it was terrible. Movin' on, then.

8 days later

CA
Cavan
xwing posted:
I know he has already been mentioned on this thread before, but I'm so p*** off with him that I'm going to mention him again.
http://www.youtube.com/user/dalbsterlcfc
He has now proceeded to re-upload videos from BBCTVContinuity's (who is still on YouTube might I add) channel, as well as others.
A comment I got from him when asking for the reason why he re-uploaded videos from TVARK:

"stop criticising my channel like u were doing with Chao772VersionIV if u want 2 block me thats fine and if u dont like my videos then stay away from my channel plz cause me and Chao772VersionIV are unhappy with ur complaints which lead 2 us blocking u!!".


Looks like YouTube have terminated his account... again!
JA
JAS84
Quote:
dalbsterlcfc has been terminated because we've received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material that the user posted.
Good riddance! Very Happy
BE
benriggers
JAS84 posted:
Quote:
dalbsterlcfc has been terminated because we've received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material that the user posted.
Good riddance! Very Happy


I'm so pleased with this! Very Happy
RE
Revitt
JAS84 posted:
Quote:
dalbsterlcfc has been terminated because we've received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material that the user posted.
Good riddance! Very Happy


I'm so pleased with this! Very Happy


I submitted a copyright claim on Saturday because that toe rag ripped and re-uploaded in full one of my continuity clips I recently uploaded. He'd not asked permission or gave credit, so I was rather hacked off. I didn't think Youtube were going to do anything until this morning when I received an email telling me they've deleted it.

Up until the other day I'd never heard of him, but looking on here I'm assuming he's well known?
BA
bilky asko
JAS84 posted:
Quote:
dalbsterlcfc has been terminated because we've received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material that the user posted.
Good riddance! Very Happy


I'm so pleased with this! Very Happy


I submitted a copyright claim on Saturday because that toe rag ripped and re-uploaded in full one of my continuity clips I recently uploaded. He'd not asked permission or gave credit, so I was rather hacked off. I didn't think Youtube were going to do anything until this morning when I received an email telling me they've deleted it.

Up until the other day I'd never heard of him, but looking on here I'm assuming he's well known?

I didn't realise YouTube upheld copyright claims for things you don't own the copyright for.
RE
Revitt
Neither did I, but if that means removing videos that come from someone else's archive without credit, then I'm not complaining.
JA
JAS84
JAS84 posted:
Quote:
dalbsterlcfc has been terminated because we've received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material that the user posted.
Good riddance! Very Happy


I'm so pleased with this! Very Happy


I submitted a copyright claim on Saturday because that toe rag ripped and re-uploaded in full one of my continuity clips I recently uploaded. He'd not asked permission or gave credit, so I was rather hacked off. I didn't think Youtube were going to do anything until this morning when I received an email telling me they've deleted it.

Up until the other day I'd never heard of him, but looking on here I'm assuming he's well known?

I didn't realise YouTube upheld copyright claims for things you don't own the copyright for.
I've seen videos get blocked by companies who don't own the material. BBC clips blocked by Channel 4, for example.
BE
benriggers
And just when you thought Dalbsterlcfc had gone:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Ryanlcfc1

Newer posts