NH
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?
As Row correctly indicated, percentages flatten out the measures you have quoted, like number of members and age of the area.
You, therefore, appear to be talking out of an area a little below your centre of gravity.
Whilst the ORIGINAL comparison, based on pure numbers, might have given a slightly false impression, the second gives a FAR fairer bias.
In simple, and rounded, terms, that even YOU will hopefully understand, about a third of TV Forum's members DON'T post, but roughly TWO thirds of the members of Media Forum don't.
I trust I've NOW made it simple enough for you to comprehend?
Nick Harvey
Founding member
H.M.S posted:
So put that on your high horse Saint Nick.
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?
As Row correctly indicated, percentages flatten out the measures you have quoted, like number of members and age of the area.
You, therefore, appear to be talking out of an area a little below your centre of gravity.
Whilst the ORIGINAL comparison, based on pure numbers, might have given a slightly false impression, the second gives a FAR fairer bias.
In simple, and rounded, terms, that even YOU will hopefully understand, about a third of TV Forum's members DON'T post, but roughly TWO thirds of the members of Media Forum don't.
I trust I've NOW made it simple enough for you to comprehend?