I've always wondered...

That FAQ was written years ago - not quite sure why I wrote "zap bandwidth" unless the old software only allowed locally held avatars.

There's still definitely no plans to ever introduce them - I don't think they add anything to a post and just clutter up the place to be honest.

I think allowing images in signatures is a much better alternative - allows you to be more creative.

http://forums.techguy.org/image.php?u=47836&dateline=1096843472

And if Mouse hadn't been declawed he'd rip that cat to shreds.

if ever there was a couple of good reasons not to have avatars eh!

And that problem could be solved by not allowing animated avatars.

Thank you, though, Asa, for replying.

It could mean zap users' bandwidth.

Clever you

I know, I'm just wonderful.