Cooltempest's Web Basic

MD

Mr D'Arcy 12 December 2003 12:45pm

Nick Harvey posted:

And I'd STRONGLY recommend that you DON'T use "Joy Online" as a name for the site, or people will get the wrong impression.

Just throw "Joy Online" at a search engine and see what type of sites get returned and you'll understand what I mean!

LOL! Yes the title for my site TV Fetish gets some rather interesting results when put into a search engine.

:-(

A former member 12 December 2003 2:07pm

Do delete this - its pontless

BB

BBC unTALENT 12 December 2003 3:51pm

cooltempest posted:

psnowdon posted:

cooltempest posted:

Make sure it haven't got ads and the url is easy and not cjb (or something like that) or you won't got many people wantting to go to it.

Not being rude, but doesn't your site have JUST THAT (cooltempest.co.uk)... except they're not pushed on to your visitors by your host but BY YOU...

It seems you've just put the link on here as a blatant way for you to earn money from a 100% ad, 0% content site.

rob posted:

Lee Stanley posted:

I was thinking that... what exaclty is the point in cooltempest.co.uk?

I've just visited this website, and it is without a doubt, the worst ever website I've seen. No content, millions of adverts and it's just boring.

Big waste of time...

All of that have been changed:

* New game to be added
* New look
* Less AD's
* Shop added
* Dogtempest to be updated soon
* Whois up-dated
* and much much much loads more to come.

Next can you PM me if you do not like my site and I shell edit it.

Mock site running as-nornal

Firstly, all you've done is pulled the ads off and replaced with the dreaded 'Coming soon' text backed by a hiddeous pattern.

Secondly, I think you've done permanent damage to the popularity of your site by having the ads on there in the first place in the intermediary time between revamps (if that was the case) because people will just expect more of the same and won't visit (the best thing I think you can hope for is that the site hasn't been that popular so atleast you won't have given too many people a bad lasting impression).

Thirdly (forgive me, this may come across as rude...) your sig isn't that nice and I don't think many people will take you up on your offer, as kind as it is.

:-(

A former member 12 December 2003 8:06pm

Oh well an sig is an sig

SR

Sir Richard Rotcod 12 December 2003 8:10pm

Well it's mildly impressive the first time, but it's rather pointless really.

:-(

A former member 12 December 2003 8:10pm

It would help if the time was accurate... besides, I have a clock in the web-booth and my operating system has a clock too.

...oh and to add insult to injury, you've spelt your web address incorrectly on the signature.

:-(

A former member 12 December 2003 9:23pm

Sig talked about deleted

SR

Sir Richard Rotcod 12 December 2003 10:48pm

cooltempest posted:

Well the pont is that when scoll down the page you the time and the date.

Why?

RO

roo 12 December 2003 10:49pm

I just *love* your use of a completely over-used, and highly pointless script. It's *AMAZING*!

NH

Nick Harvey Founding member 12 December 2003 11:10pm

Why is that signature telling me it's the 13th when it's still only the 12th?

:-(

A former member 13 December 2003 9:13am

(When I had it was the wong time)

CD

cdd 14 December 2003 11:14pm

why do you actually need any ads at all? is it to make your site look professional? isn't it obvious that nobody at all in their right mind is going to click on them, and you're probably only earning about 5 pence?

(December 2003)