MT
Why does BBC World relaunch their channel, but pay no attention whatsoever to their website? The public website (as well as the Insite section) now no longer match any of the graphical output on the channel. The main imagery doesn't even come from BBC World per se, but from BBC Four news (which, yes, I understand is simulcasted).
Moreover, the website itself is a coding nightmare ... it appears to be all database-driven, which paralyses performance, and disallows some browsers from even navigating the site. Shameful. (And if anyone asks if I have any better ideas, I do ... and I've posted them before. They're out of date now, but could easily be updated, &c.)
News 24 (whilst having a smaller site) relaunched the same day without a problem. With all the money that BBC World makes through subscriptions and advertising, why can't they spend a fraction of that on getting a website out on time that *at least* looks like their on-screen appearance?
Perhaps someone familiar with the situation could let us know when it's being updated.
http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif
Moreover, the website itself is a coding nightmare ... it appears to be all database-driven, which paralyses performance, and disallows some browsers from even navigating the site. Shameful. (And if anyone asks if I have any better ideas, I do ... and I've posted them before. They're out of date now, but could easily be updated, &c.)
News 24 (whilst having a smaller site) relaunched the same day without a problem. With all the money that BBC World makes through subscriptions and advertising, why can't they spend a fraction of that on getting a website out on time that *at least* looks like their on-screen appearance?
Perhaps someone familiar with the situation could let us know when it's being updated.
http://homepage.mac.com/robertpalmer/tvforum/sig.gif