noggin's posts, page 36

15,946 search results, most recent first

NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

Both programmes got very poor ratings last night

The BBC programme: 2.9m
The EBU programme: 2.4m

Pointless Celebrities: 3.8m
In for a Penny (Rpt): 3.3m

It seems most are only interested in the actual Song Contest and nothing more or less


Yes - there's a reason the ratings for the regular contest peak during the voting, not the performances.

Plus the EBU show was against Britain's Got Talent from 200 to 2120 - which is going to be even tougher competition.
NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

Flux posted:

I did question early on whether they should actually have made it a competition and opened a vote based on the videos of each song being shown (as the show’s format wouldn’t have to be changed much), but ultimately I think a celebration without a winner like this was probably the better option and “Love Shine a Light” was the perfect song to finish on.


As I understand it the Eurovision Song Contest as a competition couldn't be held this year partly because of event insurance issues. AIUI some of the cancellation costs of the contest have been covered by insurance. If the EBU had hosted a competition - of any sort - that insurance would not have paid out.
NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

How come Graham “Mr” Norton was the only presenter/commentator interviewed this evening? Excuse my ignorance, is he well known across Europe or is there some fascination with the UK?


Yes - many European broadcasters show The Graham Norton Show (SVT in Sweden do for instance) so he is recognised worldwide. It gets a conveyor belt of A-list Hollywood guests that many other equivalent chat shows across Europe simply don't (and that's why they buy it). And as others have said - the YouTube / Social reach is much wider than the UK.

In many ways Graham's the biggest 'name' associated with Eurovision across Europe other than former performers like Abba and Celine Dion. Not that many other national broadcasters have a commentator with as big a national reputation, presenting a major TV chat show, let alone an international one like Graham.

Whilst the UK may not always be thought of as taking the contest seriously as a country, the reality is that the BBC having Sir Terry, and then Graham as their national commentators is seen by other European broadcasters as the BBC taking the actual broadcast of the contest very seriously.

He's often been the only featured commentator on previous contests - such as when he had a confetti fired into his commentary booth in Copenhagen 2014 :
NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

Any ideas why Gina G’s performance was weirdly cropped during the BBC show earlier?


The Gina G sequence was not cropped - whilst the 1996 contest was a 4:3 SD show all of the song performances were shot 16:9 letterbox (so were ~430 line resolution rather than 576 lines). (This was when 16:9 production was beginning to be a thing, and there was some European - not just EU - money around for 16:9 production...)

Blowing 430 lines up to 1080 would have looked worse than YouTube I fear - so they treated it the same as the other 4:3 SD performances width-wise and masked the top and bottom rather than leaving the original black borders.
deejay, madmusician and UKnews gave kudos
NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

The show picked up a bit of pace in the last half hour and I think the hosts, who I guess will be back next year, did fairly decent job - though then again presenters have generally been of a better quality in recent years and the Netherlands has a strong history in television entertainment of course.


It definitely felt like Graham both lifted it and gave it a bit of heart in his interview.
NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

So, I’m confused.

On BBC One it was on 8-10 and RTÉ One it was 8-10.05, same (in BST) on TVE Internacional
On Das Erste in Germany it is on 8.55-10.55 BST - apparently according to Wikipedia it was delayed there.
But in Italy (on Rai 1) it is scheduled 7.35-10.35 BST. Where did the extra hour come from? SMTv in San Marino is also Currently simulcasting Rai 1 including ads. On RTPi (Portugal) it is being shown 9-11.15 which is also longer.

Is there a longer version which some channels are broadcasting? Or are they just using local filler material?


My guess is that Germany delayed their broadcast, and some other broadcasters did what S4C sometimes do on JESC, and took longer ad breaks and then time shifted the following parts.

There were only three 2'00" ad breaks in a 2 hour show (the NikkieTutorials stuff was the break filler) - for some commercial broadcasters 3'00" an hour wouldn't have been enough...
NG
noggin Founding member

Eurovision 2021 - Netherlands - NPO/AVROTROS/NOS

Josh posted:
Is this Come Together thing live or pre-recorded? It feels like a mixture but I'm not too sure.

I was waiting until the result was announced to answer that.

Now it has been, it’s clearly pre-recorded. Graham will have just recorded all the different versions. It was short and vague enough to allow that.


The show was live from the point you saw Graham in-vision and the voting lines open.

Doing 19 versions of a show - plus all the inevitable contingency versions for a failed vote etc. would be next to impossible to do as a pre-recorded kit of parts.
Steve Williams and UKnews gave kudos
NG
noggin Founding member

The BBC World News Thread

The background will be on the background layer of the ME bank. Doing it in a DSK would just be bizarre. If you wanted different backgrounds on the same output, you'd probably go down the split ME route, where you tie up two MEs doing the same thing, just with different backgrounds and feed those MEs out as the programme feed for each outlet.

So a Viz engine would be feeding the gallery a background rather than downstream.

The whole way the graphics engines are setup here are confusing and that’s why I was wondering if it was downstream. And could Mosart and BNCS handle that?


Yes - the galleries have dedicated Viz engines for DVE box backgrounds, full-screen still images etc. Those are cut/routed by the gallery vision mixer and are present on all outputs. For DVE boxes the Viz generating the box background is likely to be upstream keyed within an ME bank, possibly using resizers rather than a DVE, (or it could be fed into a DVE background channel if the DVE can be used independently of an ME bank, and is itself a source). There are many ways of skinning that cat on a modern mixer - and your options vary depending whether you are Sony, GVG original, GVG Kahuna etc.

Because you may need to feed things to in-vision screens as well as cutting them to air - doing all of that downstream wouldn't make sense.

Additionally there are additional overlaid Viz engines downstream of the gallery vision mixer that key on different on-screen furniture (lower thirds, flipper, clock, channel logo etc.)
NG
noggin Founding member

The BBC World News Thread


- Upstream Keys are added on the program bus or any ME as part of that Bus’s output, coming on or off as part of that Bus’s transition


On most vision mixers the keys on the Programme bank (i.e. PGM/PST) (the bus is the source pre-selector rather than the bank) ARE the main downstream keys in the desk. (That's certainly the case on mainstream Sony desks. You can chose to transition them on the PGM/PST transition area - or use the separate DSK transition buttons - but both actions drive the same keyers - usually 4 of them)

Upstream keys are the ones pre-keyed on ME banks, with the ME banks then being cut to on the PGM/PST bus.

It gets confusing on desks that don't have a PGM/PST, and instead have just ME banks (though often there is a 'not obvious' way of cutting each ME bank to mixer output so you don't have to nominate a fixed ME bank to be the equivalent of PGM/PST - the old GVG200 was like that) and in some 'all ME mixers' you have additional keyers downstream of those on the ME banks.

However on a conventional ME+PGM/PST mixer the keys on the PGM/PST bank ARE the downstream keyers within the mixer, though of course you can then have external devices keying downstream of the mixer, so it's entirely possible to have DSKs themselves downstream of the mixer DSKs.

HOWEVER...

On modern mixers it gets even more complicated as you can have multiple versions of the same ME bank with different keys on them, with multiple PGM outputs from the desk cutting to different versions of the same ME with the different keys on them, so when you cut to ME1 - your two main mixer outputs can cut to two different versions of ME1 with different keys on them. This is how modern sports production works. MEs and PGM/PSTS now have multiple outputs that you can configure to do splits.

Example :

You are the host broadcaster for a sports game, but are also the domestic broadcaster. You want a host broadcast generic replay wipe to go out on the host feed, but you want a station branded replay wipe to go out on the domestic feed. You want the replay wipe to transition between EVS replays on ME1. For this you configure two frame memory clip replay/ramcorders with the two different wipes. You configure the ME bank to do the transition with two ME1 outputs (one with the host broadcaster wipe keyed over, the other with the domestic wipe keyed over).

You configure the PGM/PST (or bottom row nominated ME etc.) to then cut to the ME1 output with the host broadcaster wipe on one PGM output, and to cut to the ME1 output with the domestic broadcaster wipe on another PGM output.

When you are cutting the match - you cut to ME and trigger the wipe as if you were cutting just a single feed of the match, and on a second PGM output you see the other wipe happen entirely in sync.

This is NOT what BBC News do - as they do their splits downstream of the mixer - but it is 'business as usual' when cutting sport events these days.
NG
noggin Founding member

TV Breakdown Appreciation Thread

Technologist - you may be able to answer this...

When I was on holiday in Sweden in the mid-to-late-00s I took a DVB-T USB tuner with me and captured some quite low level information about the DVB-T transport streams and the PIDS in use, I think using TSReader. I remember being really surprised that one of them had a Teletext PID stream with "BBC Scotland" labels somewhere in it. (I was wondering if the BBC had sold off or temporarily hired some DVB text inserters for DSat to bridge the move to PQ, or if they'd sold some off and a Swedish operator had bought one...)

As that particularly DVB-T tuner and laptop had never been to Scotland or tuned a BBC Scotland DSat broadcast I was kind of intrigued...
NG
noggin Founding member

O2 & Virgin Media To Merge


Yes, I told a VM customer friend to get a cheap TP-Link cable router for £20 from Argos which is compatible with VM. Never had a problem since with his wifi or Ethernet connections.

I've always used third-party routers with TalkTalk. Would always get buffering using the supplied ISP routers, but never any issues with the TP-Link Archer A900 router I use. It's worth paying for a decent router than the free bricks supplied by your ISP.


Yes, I replaced the BT Homehub with a 30 quid TP router for my lad'd FTTP service. Incredibly stable, in fact it managed an 'up time' of over 750 days, and that record was only messed up because of a power cut

I never had any problems with the BT or EE Homehubs when I had them, they were pretty rock solid for me; but yeah Virgin's present Superhub is totally rubbish (as was the first generation one, the second gen one was OK I found).


All my Amazon Echo Dots etc. and quite a few other devices that were connected to the BT Homehub via its internal 802.11ac WiFi and used its DHCP router started very regularly falling off the internet, complaining they weren't connected. Power cycling them got them back up, but they'd fall off again (often within hours). Power cycling the router improved things for a couple of days - but it started happening again. I don't know whether it was a DHCP address space thing (I hadn't hit the limit of DHCP-delivered addresses) or lease length (I didn't have clashes that I could see) - but replacing the BT HomeHub with a separate Draytek modem and Ubiquiti router and Access Point has made the same Amazon devices work pretty much trouble-free ever since.

I'd already swapped out the BT HomeHub with a spare I had - and that behaved similarly.

I sometimes have to download very large files (~50GB+) which will max out my connection - and that was also really flaky via the HomeHub (via a cabled connection). Switching to the Draytek + Ubiquiti set-up has made that a thing of the past too.
NG
noggin Founding member

O2 & Virgin Media To Merge

Mute posted:
I think it can vary quite a lot. Remember that all the networks were originally built by different companies to different standards. Most have been through several different owners since then, each of which had their own different standards for maintaining the network. Even now I believe that some work is outsourced to different companies in different parts of the country.
Where I am the network is fairly good, mostly because it was fully rebuilt a number of years ago, so is newer than most. I often read about people with problems where the cabinets are falling apart or the network is oversubscribed, but have never experienced anything like that myself. I have seen issues whilst visiting family elsewhere in the country, so it does appear to vary depending on where you are.


I guess there are two main issues here :

1. Physical connectivity integrity (i.e. whether your RF connection to and from Virgin Media is secure and someone can't unscrew your connection or cut your cable)

2. Network connectivity (i.e. whether Virgin Media's network configuration and infrastructure provides the internet connectivity that people expect based on their local connection speeds)

There have been constant rumblings that Virgin don't engineer some aspects of their network particularly well - and run it 'hot' (so lose packets - in the expectation that lost packets will be re-requested and re-sent)

This ignores the quality, or lack thereof, of their Superhub in router and WiFi access point terms (Virgin's hubs have been hit by an Intel bug on their main SoC, which I believe is less of/not an issue if you run your Superhub as a modem only)

Anyone who cares about decent network connectivity is likely to have ditched the router and WiFi access point portions of their ISP router - and ditched their modem if they are allowed to. (We binned our BT HomeHub ages ago - replacing it with a Draytek Vigor VDSL modem and a Ubiquiti EdgeRouter-X and Ubiquiti WiFi Access Point. The Draytek is BT approved too..)