NG
It's not unusual for TOTP to be edited to reduce the contrast/brightness of shots that fail Ofcom's Photosensitivity testing requirements.
Passing a PSE test, which is usually carried out using a Flashing Pattern Analyser (FPA), is a legal requirement for a recorded show, and so repeating TOTP untested (and unmodified were it to fail) would be a legal issue. (FPA devices used for PSE testing include Harding, Baton, Vidchecker etc.)
Without having seen the effect I can't say for certain but it's not unusual, particularly if there is a large amount of flashing in the shot.
noggin
Founding member
Top of the Pops
Strange thing on the 86 Xmas special last night, during the Boris Gardner performance they altered the picture for some reason and it looks very muddy (possibly because of the brightly lit disco ball behind him not matching modern broadcast standards?). Clearly done as part of this repeat, as you notice the captions are affected- as are the pillarboxes (if you were watching on the HD channel or the iPlayer). You can see the brightness/contrast change when Peter Powell appears on screen at the start, and it changes back to normal as soon as Gary Davies appears on screen after the performance.
It's not unusual for TOTP to be edited to reduce the contrast/brightness of shots that fail Ofcom's Photosensitivity testing requirements.
Passing a PSE test, which is usually carried out using a Flashing Pattern Analyser (FPA), is a legal requirement for a recorded show, and so repeating TOTP untested (and unmodified were it to fail) would be a legal issue. (FPA devices used for PSE testing include Harding, Baton, Vidchecker etc.)
Without having seen the effect I can't say for certain but it's not unusual, particularly if there is a large amount of flashing in the shot.