neilly's posts, page 10

171 search results, most recent first

NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

Could we please stop it with all these bring back GMTV posts? GMTV needed to end so we could start a new era, unfortunately that new era hasn't been so great just yet but hopefully the new editor will change Daybreak for the better.

It's like when people said bring back TVam, now they're saying bring back GMTV, and no doubt one day people will be saying bring back Daybreak as well. After all, RISE wasn't very good but you still see people posting their memories of it on YouTube and the like.


I absolutely agree, GMTV virtually lost half it's viewing audience in a period of four years ITV would have axed it one way or another.

I like the newsier focus since Daybreak has returned for the new year but they need to keep up the momentum. They also need to stop giving any air time to Z list celebrities and concentrate on real news stories.

However, I am just not too sure with the refreshed set it looks too orange and those hideous blinds are back again. Rolling Eyes As James said why can't they use the video wall at least it wouldn't be too bright first thing in the morning.

According to the EPG schedules, Helen Fospero will be presenting Daybreak alongside Dan on Monday which will be interesting to watch. I know I've talked about her a million times on the forum but I think she's a great presenter. I think Dan presents so much better with Helen in comparison to Kate.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

David posted:
I don't think the logo is terrible, but a logo of any quality isn't going to make me watch this programme.

In the promo there was a big fat man with the breasts of a lady. Would that even be allowed in Dubai?


I agree I do not think the logo is terrible but they could at least be more creative about the titles. I also think this reality nonsense 'Downsize in Dubai' is the same crap as before. We had 'Transformation Street' last year, 'Donate a Day' then 'Donate a coat'. When are they ever going to learn from their mistakes.

It's the content that needs to be dramatically improved if ITV wants to turn Daybreak around.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

CT24 posted:
Lucy Watson is presenting the news this week and she seems very stiff and nervous this morning. She hasn't done the news or presented on the sofa for ages now so it doesn't come as much of a surprise.


Lucy Watson comes across so differently reading the news to when she's been on the sofa, and I don't understand why.


I agree she comes across so much better when she present's from the sofa in comparison to reading the news. However, she announced on twitter that she will be the programme's New York Correspondent from the New Year. That effectively rules out any possibility of her getting the female anchor role which the frontrunners are Natasha Kaplinsky and Helen Fospero.

On the ratings front, last week the show averaged 700,000 viewers compared to Breakfast's 1.7 million down 100,000 viewers compared to the same week last year which is a major concern especially for temporary hosts Kate and Dan. This add's real pressure to the executives who need to appoint the right anchors and improvement the content of the show that gradually ratings will rise.

Also, I noticed that after 7am they have axed 'In the Mix' which they shouldn't really do because that is one of the stronger elements within the format of the show.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

CT24 posted:
John Stapleton being on the show for the last two days has shown IMO that Dan is not really presenter material. He seems like a really nice guy and is good at his Sports presenting, but as for being anchor of the main show, I do not think he is experienced, qualified or serious enough.

I thought John's interview with the TOWIE cast was great - he even made that a serious interview and asked a lot of questions that anyone who watches TOWIE has been wondering. I think John and Kate make a great team. While Kate can also do the serious stuff and interview the Prime Minister after years of experience, she can also do the lighter stuff as well.


Completely agree with everything here.

Dan is too much of a lightweight presenter, whilst he can be good, serious interviewing is not one of his strong points. Where as John is a good all rounder, great at the serious stories but can also tackle more showbiz oriented interviews like on Tuesday with the TOWIE cast.

John and Kate work great together and I would love to see them both as the main anchors but I have a feeling it's going to be two new presenters sadly.


I agree it has been great to see John and Kate present Daybreak together. John Stapleton has brought more gravitas to the programme which was displayed by the interview with the TOWIE cast. I also agree that even though Dan Lobb is a good presenter I have always's got the impression that he was only relief presenter material. He comes across as too lightweight to handle serious news even though he has great chemistry with Kate and is popular amongst Daybreak viewers.

I think if they appoint replacements they should really consider Matt Barbet and Helen Fospero for the roles as anchors. I also think John Stapleton should be given a more significant role in the future. In terms of changing the format, it is clear it needs to be more news orientated as we have discussed so many times. However, I would argue that 'In the Mix' is one of Daybreak's most successful items that should not be axed. If they change the format they could replace the segment with a more formal newspaper review without all the usual chit chat. It will be really interesting to see what changes they implement over the next few weeks.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

Worth noting between the 26th and the 30th there's no Daybreak and Lorraine at all in the morning, which is unlike last year it was on nearly everyday and got trounced in the ratings. CITV and a film occupies the 6-9.25am slot all week.


I wonder if this is because there are "significant" set changes taking place possibly? There was rumour that this would occur September but was then postponed to the new year.


It will be interesting to see if the implement the 'significant set changes' in the new year that were supposed to occur in September. I cannot blame ITV for not showing Daybreak between 26th and 30th of December as a result of the show's dire ratings of 300,000. Considering the negative publicity it would create it would be cheaper showing CITV during that slot.

According to broadcast, Daybreak's Deputy Editor Paul Connolly is to leave with immediate effect. He was responsible to editorial output after Ian Rumsey left in September. Apparently production staff were informed by e-mail that he was sacked from the post by new editor David Kermorde. The article said Kermode would announce his Deputy Editor in the next few days. It also says the new editor is currently looking at the whole shape of the programme. This could be an encouraging sign that in terms of content and format there could be major changes for the better.

As for new presenters, the article suggests the presenting configurations are being mulled over, but decision is still to be made. An announcement is expected at the New Year on who will replace Adrian and Christine as new anchors.

http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/people/daybreak-deputy-ed-to-leave/5035517.article
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

I agree with James, they have to appoint anchors that can handle the serious news items but also the lighter items as well. However, they must tackle the content and format of the programme as a key priority if they want to improve ratings.

In terms of ratings for last week, Daybreak seems to be down compared to last year which attacted an average audience around 923,000 due to the bad weather reaching a million viewers on December 2nd 2010.

Here were the ratings for last week with the AI figures.

28 Nov 831,000 AI 72
29 Nov 784,000 AI 65
30 Nov 672,000 AI 68
1 Dec 773,000 AI 68
2 Dec 785.000 AI 67
5 Dec 818,000

Figures courtesy of the DS forum.

Yesterday's episode only attracted 818,000 viewers compared to Breakfasts 1.6 million and Lorraine's 1.1 million. Also Audience Appreciation figures appear to hoover around the late 60s and early 70s which is still low.
There is still much more work to be done on the programme before ratings can improve.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

CT24 posted:
I think we should have seen them receiving them flowers on air, would have been a nice touch and they deserved a montage of their time presenting the show, too.

I am going to miss them in a way, more so Christine than Adrian and I do feel that it's unfair that they've both been blamed for the failure of the show. It was always going to fail regardless of the presenters.


I absolutely agree, I thought they should have showed a montage of their time presenting the programme. They did after all launch the show. I will miss both Adrian and Christine presenting the show, however as I've always said its not the presenters it's the the format that is the problem. They seriously need to look at the content of the show before appointing replacements. If they do not change the content or go to far down the showbiz entertainment route as some papers suggested ratings will decline sharply and Daybreak will become more unpopular.

I think that improving Daybreak's performance will take place over the long term. Even when new presenters are found it will take many months for things to start improving.

It will be interesting to see how long it takes to appoint the new presenters. At the moment, Natasha Kaplinsky and Eamonn Holmes are apparently the frontrunners even though she has ruled herself and he has signed a 3 year contract with Sky News.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

According, to an article in The Sun Newspaper, this Monday could be the last time we see Adrian and Christine together presenting Daybreak. It article say's bosses hoped to keep them on air until Christmas but supposedly Adrian wants to leave after being axed. It could well be wrong as you have to take what the papers say with a pinch of salt. The article goes onto to say that it is still being decided if they will have a "best of" package of their time presenting the programme. In contrast they might just leave quietly without any fanfare.

It will be interesting to see what happen's over the next few weeks in the run up to christmas. As many articles have reported well probably see Dan and Kate take over until replacements are found in the new year. In terms of potential replacements I think as others have said on the forum Matt Barbet would be a good choice as anchor alongside Helen Fospero. I think that would make for a good partnership as well as bringing more gravitas to the programme.

However, we'll see what happens with David Kermode taking over today as Editor.

Link:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/3970771/Adrian-Chiles-makes-an-early-break.html
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

dbl posted:
John Stapleton presenting with Christine! It's been a while.....


It was really good to see John Stapleton present Daybreak alongside Christine today. I thought they had very good chemistry and Christine came across much more professional. I think whatever happen's with the presenting line up after the New Year, John Stapleton should be given a more significant role. I know some will want to move away from the GMTV days but he is a very experienced presenter that can bring gravitas to the programme (although everybody to their own opinions).
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

JK08 posted:
I've read today (I know there are lots of conflicting stories at the moment) that exec producer Karl Newton wants to make Daybreak a big entertainment/celeb show - completely different to Breakfast. Big mistake IMO, that's not what people want in the morning. They need to make Daybreak what they promised us it would be.


People want to wake up in the morning and find out what's happening in the world, not whether Katie Price has bought a new horse. Big mistake. People on the forum have been saying that as it's getting newsier, it's getting better. This is what people want.. not a celebrity, showbiz programme as they sip their morning coffee.


I absolutely agree people want to know the news, sport and weather. They are not really interested in Z list celebrities. That is Daybreak's fundamental problem along with these repetitive competitions and constant sponsorship adverts. I would have to say that the content has improved the programme is much more newsier compared to earlier this year. But, as I've said before there needs to be much more improvement in terms of content. On the big news days such as the death of Osama Bin Laden and the Riots this year that Daybreak can produce very good coverage.

If David Kermode and the other producers are serious about revitalising the format they need to strategically place advert breaks much more effectively, they have to ditch the competitions once and for all (even though they would loose money) and they need to have more regular news updates (similar to 5 a day) instead of the main two headlines, as well as transfering most celebrity and showbiz items to Lorraine's show. GMTV in its heyday use to achieve the right balance before it went downhill, however Daybreak has to try to get the right balance.

Also in terms of possible replacements for Adrian or Christine, I do not think bringing in Sian Williams or Chris Hollins will make any real difference even though they are credible broadcasters (however everybody to their own opinions). I would like to see someone like Helen Fospero given the anchor role because of her experience and familiarity with the audience. However, I suspect in the months running up to April we are probably going to see a number of different presenting duo's.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

I've just noticed on the schedule that John Stapleton is going to present Daybreak alongside Christine Bleakley this Wednesday. I think this will make for an interesting pairing and could work very well. It will be good to see John front the programme again with his wealth of experience.
NE
neilly

Daybreak - the launch onwards

DrewF posted:
*


Daybreak better be careful not to make that background too 'busy'. Was a very nice shot indeed.


That's very true - I would prefer it if that wall was just blank, how it was at the launch, but with the 'homely' yellow lighting. The coffee machine, and all of that other stuff is simply just clutter!


I suppose that's the difference in audiences. Young males may look at it and think that it looks cluttered, where as their target audience may think it looks homely. I must admit that I prefer the smaller amount of yellow lighting on the main sofa set nowadays, though that could be after the blinds over did it.


I absolutely agree, I think it is a matter of opinion whether the set is cluttered or not. I think it is slightly cluttered with the coffee table. However, at least they haven't overdone it with those hideous yellow blinds. Also the LED screens are not the horrible bright yellow setanta colour they used to be.

In terms of content, the programme is getting better but there is still a vast amount of improvement needed. I hope Helen Fospero presents Daybreak again because I think she was great. I know I keep talking about her but whatever happens with Daybreak in the future she should definitely play a key role.