archiveTV's posts, page 10

513 search results, most recent first

TV
archiveTV

Newsnight

itsrobert posted:
The thing I don't like about Paxman is the way he shows his feelings onscreen. He's done this before - remember the weather forecast saga a few years ago? You don't see any other newsreader criticising the BBC or its decisions. It doesn't come across as being terribly professional.


I think you missed the fact that his tongue was firmly in his cheek, and it provided highly entertaining television.
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

noggin posted:
Manxy posted:
DJ Dave posted:
Manxy posted:
623058 posted:
can I ask how will the move of Neighbours to Five effect Six oclock news?

is there a chance of a dip in the ratings?

Well they are replacing neighbours with the Weakest Link which gets better ratings than Neighbours, so the ratings could actually go up.


Where did you get that info that it beats Neighbours?

On average Neighbours gets between 2.5 and 2.7 million from 5.35, whereas The Weakest Link gets between 2.7 and 3.1 million from 5.15.


Yep - the 1735 Neighbours is usually beaten by the 1715 Weakest Link. However BARB merge the two daily airings of Neighbours into one combined rating ISTR - so that when the ratings are published it can look as if Neighbours is still rating higher - but this is the result of the merging of ratings.


Didn't Barb stop mergeing the ratings for repeats a few years ago! the differences between overnights and published figures is usually due to final figures being compiled across the actual running time of the programme, rather than its scheduled time, and because the final figures include those who time shift the programme.
TV
archiveTV

BBC News 24: Presentation discussion

StuartPlymouth posted:
Bail posted:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=N_Wd1oythAk&feature=related - Seems not the first time its happened.

Oh, I like that. I'm assuming that is what BBC WORLD play out during commercial breaks when the local feed isn't taking adverts?


No. That's the backing for the headline wipe.

World play out the Dynamic Junction when the local feed isn't taking advertising
TV
archiveTV

Newsnight

Stitch08 posted:
If it was a major enough story though they could just delay the start of Newsnight by 5 or 10 minutes.


What's BBC2 meant to do? Twiddle their thumbs Play the potters wheel?
TV
archiveTV

Newsnight

salfordjohn posted:
I tried to add to the existing Newsnight thread - but it's been closed.

I have noticed a few times now that at the beginning of Newsnight, the opening titles play then cut to a 'sweeping' shot of the studio as the camera approaches the desk.

Then the 'good evening' shot with Jeremy/Gavin looking at the camera.

However, the approach shot seems to be pre-recorded because jeremy/Gavin have been looking down at their script, then when it cuts to their front-on shot they are already looking at the camera. You don't see their head move to look up.

I have seen this a few times now, why would they pre-record that opening shot?


The opeing headlines are usually pre recorded as they are usually quite complicated and often take a couple of times to get right.
It also helps Scotland as they have to opt out of the final two headlines and do their own, so it's useful if they know how long they have.
It's usually done about 1015, which of course won't be possible from this week, so i guess they will either do it live or record it at 9.30.
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

martinDTanderson posted:
Instead of all this speculation, perhaps some kind BBC insider could explain what the plan will be should The Rolling News need to split from The National News during a bulletin...


Thats the point. There isn't one
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

seamus posted:
Wouldn't a good solution for major breaking news be to simulcast World, like overnights, where there is a somewhat more UK oriented agenda?


Well joining World will be the only quick option for News24. That of course relies on the fact that world is covering the story. They were yesterday, but a major domestic story, say Peter Hain resigns, would not be covered on World at all.

gilsta posted:
If the gallery required to run a breaking news operation would be the equivalent of a regional studio, why not use a regional studio? Bump London out of their studio and ask the National presenter to read the London news, or at least the first item - i.e. London doesn't opt out and stays with the National presenter who reads the first story (with headlines if you want to be ambitious), then opts out to play the report. By this stage N24 is playing a report / weather / trailers that allow it to switch back to N6 fairly smoothly. Yes it would be messy but when you have an incident the size of a plane crash landing at Heathrow you cannot afford for N24 not to be covering it.

What is the situation with the Westminster studio - is it still operational? That could be a handy get out of jail card, stick a political correspondent on as presenter and get a few lines from TVC. Again technically it would hardly be a brilliant broadcast with the director and editor barking down the phone to inexperienced ops from TVC but at least its something.


Who will there be to staff it. BBC news is making hundreds of staff redundant. It simply does not have people sitting around in regions who can leap into action in a split second to provide a rolling news service.
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

Moz posted:
noggin posted:
Dunedin posted:

As I've said all along you simply need an old fashioned microphone to talk over live or relevant pictures with appropriate astons whilst the network programme finishes. A single fixed camera in a broom-cupboard (remember the old CBBC!) would suffice for the ?10-15 occasions it is required per annum.


Err - you need a hell of a lot more than that. You would need a vision mixer (probably with a DVE), a sound mixer, a separate gallery, a small studio or newsroom camera, ideally autocue (though the presenter could operate), some server playin (so that you can show recorded material), and some graphics, some outside sources to get the live pictures in, and some means of routing them. Effectively you need quite a lot more kit than a regional breakfast bulletin - pretty close to a full gallery, but without a multicamera studio.

And you'd need at least a producer and a director/vision mixer/sound mixer (and ideally a separate vision and sound mixer if you are really going to do breaking news coverage)

Why do you need all this if you're just talking over live pictures?


But today they didn't have any live pictures after about 10 minutes. And the presenters were doing far more than talking. They were dong lives scanning wires etc.
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

alarsne53 posted:
archiveTV posted:
alarsne53 posted:
Depends, they might be able to use TC7 if its free?
With what crew?


Would the working lunch crew not be able to take over for a short while?


NO they are all on their way home. And the studio is in bits being rerigged and re lit for Hardtalk and Newsround. You could probably fire up a studio in 30 minutes or so, but if we are talking about spliting off from the one during the breaking news, then there is no chance
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

alarsne53 posted:
Depends, they might be able to use TC7 if its free?
With what crew?
TV
archiveTV

BBC News - General

alarsne53 posted:
News 24 broke away from the One O'clock news to cover the Heathrow plane crash this afternoon.


Something they won't be able to do from the end of January
TV
archiveTV

Ex Radio 1 DJ Kevin Greening Dies

http://www.nme.com/news/nme/33433

Why the hell would anyone do that to their body?