Whatever solution may be found to the problem of news provision in the south of Scotland, it isn't going to involve ITV franchise changes as such.
The current licences run until 2014 legally but I don't think anyone expects a franchise round in any sense. It would be unrealistic. ITVplc would almost certainly not enter the contest for the English and Welsh franchises and simply provide ITV1 on satellite, cable and one of the other slots on Freeview.
Ofcom has spoken of rationalising the system when the current franchises run out with four licences - one for each nation - which presumably could see the south of Scotland, or at least Selkirk, move to STV. But there are too many ifs and buts over the next few years to predict what will happen. For a start, the relationship between STV and ITVplc may continue to evolve to the extent that the C3 network as we have known it won't really exist.
Anyway a few points people in the south of Scotland may want to consider.
*If you are not a Scottish nationalist, why is the legally enforcable case for REGIONAL news within the south of Scotland any different to the case for regional news in the south west of England or the East Midlands? These are larger, more commercially viable areas which no longer have a distinct service.
*Why should a commercial organisation be legally obliged to provide a layer of local news coverage which the BBC doesn't?
*Border Selkirk and the Scottish relays of Caldbeck could move to STV in 2014 in theory - but would people in the Borders get more local news? We still don't know what form STV's news provision will take in a few months time after the collapse of the IFNCs. The status quo is not a long term option and it is possible they may propose moving to a Scotland-wide service (ie STV and "Grampian") with some sub opts.
*The UK Government does not believe in artificially preserving the current regional set up. It wants to find ways of making genuinely local news viable.