AD
http://www.gamingtelly.co.uk/adam/bidupnews.jpg
The new bid-up.tv simulator is being worked on!
Here are some of the features of the new simulator....
+ Dynamic bidder name and location compilation
+ Create auctions automatically without inputting information
+ You can direct: Control camera angles, information on screen
+ Auto pilot direction: Let the sim control camera and screen display
+ Supports "Hot Lots" (3 minute countdown auctions)
+ Supports Speed Auctions
+ Saves your progress, profit margin, takes into consideration amount of timebidders spend on the phone, and postage costs / overheads!
+ Global online leaderboard on official sim website
+ Supports streaming, and live online auctions, so you can play with others and visit their auctions.
The beta verion is about 40% complete, we will be looking for Beta Testers closer to the time, so please PM me if you'd like to be involved.
The NEW bid-up.tv simulator!
Exciting stuff's happening over at SQGTelly.comhttp://www.gamingtelly.co.uk/adam/bidupnews.jpg
The new bid-up.tv simulator is being worked on!
Here are some of the features of the new simulator....
+ Dynamic bidder name and location compilation
+ Create auctions automatically without inputting information
+ You can direct: Control camera angles, information on screen
+ Auto pilot direction: Let the sim control camera and screen display
+ Supports "Hot Lots" (3 minute countdown auctions)
+ Supports Speed Auctions
+ Saves your progress, profit margin, takes into consideration amount of timebidders spend on the phone, and postage costs / overheads!
+ Global online leaderboard on official sim website
+ Supports streaming, and live online auctions, so you can play with others and visit their auctions.
The beta verion is about 40% complete, we will be looking for Beta Testers closer to the time, so please PM me if you'd like to be involved.
AD
I use Photoshop, Bryce 5.5, Adobe Premiere and Movie Maker to convert to WMV.
Central idents and animations
And just to make it into a threesome...I use Photoshop, Bryce 5.5, Adobe Premiere and Movie Maker to convert to WMV.
AD
I don't know what it is about you, but you're just not getting the message.
Face it...
Your mocks are crap, your attitude stinks, and you're too embarrassed to say what software you used purely on the basis that it's a big pile of tripe.
I love your comment about me being narrow minded, I am very broad minded and I'm always open to new ideas. If I was so closed minded, I would be banned from the forum by now.
No matter how open minded you are, these mocks are CRAP. The effects look terrible, the quality is poor and the text underneath the logo is barely legible! You should stop treating them as if they are your little babies and open up your mind. If you saw these on your TV, wouldn't you complain to the CEO of ITV Plc and ask why they have wasted so much money on this rubbish?
You shouldn't expect to be treated like royalty, especially with the attitude you have got. I'm not a nasty person, but you my just don't get the message.
Central idents and animations
Moderators, before I post this. I apologise if this is crossing over the line, but he deserves it.I don't know what it is about you, but you're just not getting the message.
Face it...
Your mocks are crap, your attitude stinks, and you're too embarrassed to say what software you used purely on the basis that it's a big pile of tripe.
I love your comment about me being narrow minded, I am very broad minded and I'm always open to new ideas. If I was so closed minded, I would be banned from the forum by now.
No matter how open minded you are, these mocks are CRAP. The effects look terrible, the quality is poor and the text underneath the logo is barely legible! You should stop treating them as if they are your little babies and open up your mind. If you saw these on your TV, wouldn't you complain to the CEO of ITV Plc and ask why they have wasted so much money on this rubbish?
You shouldn't expect to be treated like royalty, especially with the attitude you have got. I'm not a nasty person, but you my just don't get the message.
AD
Yes actually, I think you would want to tell us if we think the software you're using is crap. Anyone with a brain would realise that to prove me wrong and to prove that you are using half decent software then you name it.
Central idents and animations
Central posted:
When I get pathetic commets like,
you must be using crap software then
Do you think I want to tell you what I am using.
Yes actually, I think you would want to tell us if we think the software you're using is crap. Anyone with a brain would realise that to prove me wrong and to prove that you are using half decent software then you name it.
AD
We can all use pretty colours and bold text, it doesn't make what you're saying any more valid or worth while.
You really do let it in for yourself. I'm not here to cause arguements, I'm here to comment on the mocks on this 'pathetic mocks forum'. I'm sure Asa will be extremely happy to help you stick your membership on the forum 'where the sun don't shine'. I'll be happy to see you go - I don't have to waste my time wading through this sort of tripe again to find some decent mocks.
I personally have not given constructive critiscism, as you have not shown the manners and the curtosey to warrant any form of constructive criticism. The mock looks terrible, and as Nini said, anyone with the slightest bit of taste would find these mocks vile.
Now, if you find this mocks forum pathetic, why did you post your mocks here?
Central idents and animations
Central posted:
As i said, it is you with the attitude problems. 
Not one of you on here has given me constructive feed back and please re read my last posts. This topic is now coming to an end, we could go on and on.
But as far as I am concerned, you can keep you pathetic mocks forum and stick it where the sun don't shine. Most of the replys on here are just plain pathetic. I won't be posting any more graphics mocks on this forum.
Not one of you on here has given me constructive feed back and please re read my last posts. This topic is now coming to an end, we could go on and on.
But as far as I am concerned, you can keep you pathetic mocks forum and stick it where the sun don't shine. Most of the replys on here are just plain pathetic. I won't be posting any more graphics mocks on this forum.
We can all use pretty colours and bold text, it doesn't make what you're saying any more valid or worth while.
You really do let it in for yourself. I'm not here to cause arguements, I'm here to comment on the mocks on this 'pathetic mocks forum'. I'm sure Asa will be extremely happy to help you stick your membership on the forum 'where the sun don't shine'. I'll be happy to see you go - I don't have to waste my time wading through this sort of tripe again to find some decent mocks.
I personally have not given constructive critiscism, as you have not shown the manners and the curtosey to warrant any form of constructive criticism. The mock looks terrible, and as Nini said, anyone with the slightest bit of taste would find these mocks vile.
Now, if you find this mocks forum pathetic, why did you post your mocks here?
AD
That's just an implicit way of saying it's a big pile of cack then. Your attitude quite frankly stinks, you have to be almost on a par with enyafreak. Big headedness, and egotism are not welcome on TV Forum. Now if I were you, I'd either change my attitude or vamoose.
Heathbury Central, I quite like your mock, and I'd like to see some developments - possibly idents, endcaps and some more promotion borads.
Central idents and animations
Central posted:
Anyway for the person saying about what software I use, I am not telling you because you will just slag it off like you have just done
That's just an implicit way of saying it's a big pile of cack then. Your attitude quite frankly stinks, you have to be almost on a par with enyafreak. Big headedness, and egotism are not welcome on TV Forum. Now if I were you, I'd either change my attitude or vamoose.
Heathbury Central, I quite like your mock, and I'd like to see some developments - possibly idents, endcaps and some more promotion borads.
AD
Can we have a link to the forum in question who gave you 4/5?
Central idents and animations
The fact that you're refusing to state the name of the software to me hints more than slighlty at the fact that it's probably a big pile of cack. It's also quite amusing to see someone who has very few posts acting very arrogantly towards the longer-standing members of this forum. I think your mocks are vile, and for your information, I mock regularly. I don't necessarily post the mocks here though, as they may not be of interest to the majority of people.Can we have a link to the forum in question who gave you 4/5?
AD
This new system is nice in theory, but there will always be loopholes.
Tighter rules for quiz shows and channels
The best way to stop people going overboard is to have an automated system on their first call of the day asking them to key in their budget for that evening, and then preventing any further entries that night after their budget has been used up.This new system is nice in theory, but there will always be loopholes.
AD
Martin, why do you always feel the need to shout when someone makes an error - in your opinion - with their font choice. Yes, it may be a custom font, but it looks good and suits the mock well. I know both yourself and Luke are very talented when it comes to designing things. In this case, the choice of font may matter more than with some of the more experimental mocks, but I know that you'd shout and scream blue murder to a less experienced mocker if they made a similar error.
As for the mock, on the whole it's pretty nice. I particularly like the shineyness of the set, but the grey area of the back wall is letting it down slightly. The titles suit the mock very well, and I particularly like the end screen The straps look fine at the moment, although the mismatching fonts is something which could be rectified. I have a slight problem with the interest panel though, as some of the text towards the top of it is quite hard to read due to the bright background. Other than that minor gripe, the mock's pretty good!
newsgrid - personalised rolling news concept
martinDTanderson posted:
DONT USE CUSTOM FONTS FOR OTHER COMPANIES IN MOCKS OR FOR YOUR OWN SITES UNRELATED TO THE ORIGINAL COMPANY...
Martin, why do you always feel the need to shout when someone makes an error - in your opinion - with their font choice. Yes, it may be a custom font, but it looks good and suits the mock well. I know both yourself and Luke are very talented when it comes to designing things. In this case, the choice of font may matter more than with some of the more experimental mocks, but I know that you'd shout and scream blue murder to a less experienced mocker if they made a similar error.
As for the mock, on the whole it's pretty nice. I particularly like the shineyness of the set, but the grey area of the back wall is letting it down slightly. The titles suit the mock very well, and I particularly like the end screen The straps look fine at the moment, although the mismatching fonts is something which could be rectified. I have a slight problem with the interest panel though, as some of the text towards the top of it is quite hard to read due to the bright background. Other than that minor gripe, the mock's pretty good!
AD
Tilt, The Joust (used for Danger Zone from 1993), Skytrak, Suspension Bridge and an unused soundtrack called Powerball are all on the 1993 CD called 'The Return of the Gladiators'.
I picked both of these CDs up on eBay quite cheaply.
Gladiators
Atlaspheres, The Wall, Danger Zone, Swingshot and Hang Tough are all on the original CD called 'Gladiators'.Tilt, The Joust (used for Danger Zone from 1993), Skytrak, Suspension Bridge and an unused soundtrack called Powerball are all on the 1993 CD called 'The Return of the Gladiators'.
I picked both of these CDs up on eBay quite cheaply.
AD