BR
That sums up Sky Sports and BT Sport as a whole - the ratings just don't add up to the fees paid in most cases, and subscriptions appear to be subsidised by other areas of the business.
Back to the cricket and if Sky really are willing to pay £40m a year for a fledgling league in a sport dwindling in popularity it shows how much of a premium they're willing to pay to keep cricket to themselves - indeed I'd go as far as saying it's anti-competitive. It doesn't help too that unlike most other sports the ECB has a monopoly on cricket played in this country - football and rugby plus I think golf and tennis all have different organisations selling UK events to broadcasters - or at the very least the rights split in such a way they can be sold separately.
La Liga is a nice addition and the most popular of the foreign leagues, but bar the occasional big game the ratings are by and large nothing to write home about.
That sums up Sky Sports and BT Sport as a whole - the ratings just don't add up to the fees paid in most cases, and subscriptions appear to be subsidised by other areas of the business.
Back to the cricket and if Sky really are willing to pay £40m a year for a fledgling league in a sport dwindling in popularity it shows how much of a premium they're willing to pay to keep cricket to themselves - indeed I'd go as far as saying it's anti-competitive. It doesn't help too that unlike most other sports the ECB has a monopoly on cricket played in this country - football and rugby plus I think golf and tennis all have different organisations selling UK events to broadcasters - or at the very least the rights split in such a way they can be sold separately.