BBC Television Rebrand Project 2013/2014

So the BBC UK Channels has been using the same logos for a few years now and I thought it was time for a change.
(IDENTS WILL COME SOON) Logos and menus are already made.

So I decided to go back to logo basics with the BBC logos but use different fonts for each channel but this is not going to be a repeat of the 90's BBC logo disaster.

This is the non-gradient version of the logos:

Here are the explanations of the new BBC TV logos:
BBC One:

BBC Two:

BBC Three:

BBC Four:


So creating a menu requires (well for me anyway) taking a visit to the BBC website for guides. So, here they are! What I did was I used the font from the BBC TV fonts (e.g One, Two, Three, Four).
BBC One:

BBC Two:

BBC Three:

BBC Four:


These are the things which pop up at the end of a show promo
BBC One:

BBC Two:

BBC Three:

BBC Four:

This project is not finished but I wanted to see how I was doing. Fake junction and idents will come soon!
Thanks for viewing!
-mikey88772

For your own sake, stop, and read 'The Art Of Mocking'.

1) Gradients used horrendously
2) Jaggered logos and fonts
3) Stretched images
4) Lack of 16:9 safe areas
5) Where's the concept? Can you imagine this on TV?

The... the what?

In the 90's there was a cost problem with BBC logos with personality. This is why we got the new logos in 1997. What I'm saying that the logo can have personality but with just a different typeface.

Before going into all the stuff like safe areas. Can I ask if you can imagine your stuff in it's current form being used on screen?

Beautiful.

I can after it's been improved but this is just the concept so far.


Thank you

No, looks like a 5 minute job.

I'm not sure what the concept is here.

My eyes... they burn.

Seriously though, I agree with AxG.

0 out everything. No effort.

As Jonny once said 'this is the level of astuteness we're up against'. Beyond 'this font suits the channel' 'this font looks better': why does it suit it better? Why is this better? And why have you created a gradiented mess which I assume is supposed to be a copy of MDTA's work (although it's insulting to him to even call it a copy)?