CW
Charlie Wells
Moderator
Well it was only a matter of time before Daily Mail wrote an article about what could be seen in the background...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html#comments
It's probably also only a matter of time before they stop accepting comments on the article, as the overwhelming majority of comments are either criticising the DM or taking the p*** about the article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html#comments
It's probably also only a matter of time before they stop accepting comments on the article, as the overwhelming majority of comments are either criticising the DM or taking the p*** about the article.
NY
Really? this is news lol, Then they probably shouldn't watch the Canadian Sportscentre on TSN
Well it was only a matter of time before Daily Mail wrote an article about what could be seen in the background...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html#comments
It's probably also only a matter of time before they stop accepting comments on the article, as the overwhelming majority of comments are either criticising the DM or taking the p*** about the article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html#comments
It's probably also only a matter of time before they stop accepting comments on the article, as the overwhelming majority of comments are either criticising the DM or taking the p*** about the article.
Really? this is news lol, Then they probably shouldn't watch the Canadian Sportscentre on TSN
BU
The headline text on the 2003 globe was a nice idea but it was always a bit juddery and sometimes the music starter later than the titles. The generic version on the national news bulletins always looked so much smoother (that said, what was the point in having BBC News round the globe and then again as a form-up at the end? always seemed a bit strange)
There was a period when News 24 won an award for something and wanted that text on the end of the titles, but clearly it took a while to get it into the live-render version so they used a generic version for a week or two. And it looked a lot better!
There was a period when News 24 won an award for something and wanted that text on the end of the titles, but clearly it took a while to get it into the live-render version so they used a generic version for a week or two. And it looked a lot better!
FL
I must complement Huw on his handover to the Six, some interview about an architecture award ran very close to the wire (17:59) and handed back to Huw, he had about 20 seconds before six o clock so he said there'd be more on the top story about the British woman before saying 'Here's Fiona Bruce...' and straight into the Six we go.
I notice that the screens above E aren't showing News Channel and World output anymore on the TOTH sequence.
I notice that the screens above E aren't showing News Channel and World output anymore on the TOTH sequence.
WO
If it were someone dropping their trousers, then there would be room for complaint. Although it would be funny TV I must admit.
Nobody ever whined about the goings on in the background whilst News 24 was in N8/N9.
The live newsroom is better than the god awful Barco screens!
Well it was only a matter of time before Daily Mail wrote an article about what could be seen in the background...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html#comments
It's probably also only a matter of time before they stop accepting comments on the article, as the overwhelming majority of comments are either criticising the DM or taking the p*** about the article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html#comments
It's probably also only a matter of time before they stop accepting comments on the article, as the overwhelming majority of comments are either criticising the DM or taking the p*** about the article.
If it were someone dropping their trousers, then there would be room for complaint. Although it would be funny TV I must admit.
Nobody ever whined about the goings on in the background whilst News 24 was in N8/N9.
The live newsroom is better than the god awful Barco screens!
WO
They were this morning. They seem to go to the white/red BBC News slides in the evening.
I must complement Huw on his handover to the Six, some interview about an architecture award ran very close to the wire (17:59) and handed back to Huw, he had about 20 seconds before six o clock so he said there'd be more on the top story about the British woman before saying 'Here's Fiona Bruce...' and straight into the Six we go.
I notice that the screens above E aren't showing News Channel and World output anymore on the TOTH sequence.
I notice that the screens above E aren't showing News Channel and World output anymore on the TOTH sequence.
They were this morning. They seem to go to the white/red BBC News slides in the evening.
GE
"The glass wall behind Sophie Raworth may blur things a little, but it looks as if the woman behind her is giving her nose a nice clean"
er.. no, that'll be depth of field.
thegeek
Founding member
Well it was only a matter of time before Daily Mail wrote an article about what could be seen in the background...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html
"The glass wall behind Sophie Raworth may blur things a little, but it looks as if the woman behind her is giving her nose a nice clean"
er.. no, that'll be depth of field.
DO
"The glass wall behind Sophie Raworth may blur things a little, but it looks as if the woman behind her is giving her nose a nice clean"
er.. no, that'll be depth of field.
Since they can't even get the name of the tweeter complaining about his shiny bald spot right, despite putting a picture of said tweet two lines further up, I doubt they'll be concerned by such technical details.
Well it was only a matter of time before Daily Mail wrote an article about what could be seen in the background...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2433055/BBC-News-workers-fighting-umbrellas-picking-nose-presenters-causes-viewers-outrage.html
"The glass wall behind Sophie Raworth may blur things a little, but it looks as if the woman behind her is giving her nose a nice clean"
er.. no, that'll be depth of field.
Since they can't even get the name of the tweeter complaining about his shiny bald spot right, despite putting a picture of said tweet two lines further up, I doubt they'll be concerned by such technical details.
JW
You'd think they'd be more concerned about the camera that was standing looking over Kate Silverton's shoulder on Monday's One O'clock News! How it got there, I've no idea. Perhaps it was a deliberate directorial move to block out someone having a cheese and pickle sandwich in the newsroom behind?
As if to react to a scolding, same camera slowly crept away to the right of the shot as we look at it, to hide (rather unsuccessfully) behind the plasma* screen off to Kate's left shoulder!
*I know it's not a plasma, but whatever it is.
As if to react to a scolding, same camera slowly crept away to the right of the shot as we look at it, to hide (rather unsuccessfully) behind the plasma* screen off to Kate's left shoulder!
*I know it's not a plasma, but whatever it is.