I agree with all of the points made here, really. The logos really do seem to change on a weekly basis, and generally aren't improvements on their predecessors. And I do think the idea of 'the TV Live network' has became far too prominent - something in the balance has changed so that the site itself is more important than the content on it.
Also, I think there's a problem where you're trying to do too much - TV Live doesn't need to be a network, but you're trying to force it to become so. TV Live Presents is a nice idea, but has been used only a handful of times, and doesn't really make sense, compared to what everything else on the site is doing - I don't think TV Live is where it should be. Also, and this might just be my opinion, but I don't really understand the need for Liveblogs and TV Live Extra - people that Liveblog things with a decent following have that following because they are a high-profile figure or add something to it - one opinion and some tweets isn't that. And seeing as TV Live Chat has failed the past three times, due to a lack of interest, I don't see why you keep trying to flog that dead horse.
I think you should scale it back to the core - TV Live and TV Live Wiki really are all you need. TV Live doesn't need to be a jack of a trades, and was successful before it tried to do so.
I know it sounds like I've taken the opportunity to attack, but I think this needed to be said.
623058: it just seems like your an mp3 whore