Mock Designs

CNN US

(April 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
:-(
A former member
Now i designed these while i was away, hence the news story thats on the mock. Its based on the CNN look for breaking news, and devloping story.

http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/5320/cnn1kv8.png

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/5882/cnn2ar2.png

http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/4641/cnn3aj4.png

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/344/cnn4gq0.png
DB
dbl
Wouldn't work - American graphics like to be OTT and like to be 3D on every single bloody element.
NJ
Neil Jones Founding member
Nice but a bit flat for use on an American network - think big, bold, in your face, can see it from the other end of the house. Not quite sure what sort of channel over here it could work on - could work on a quiz channel I suppose with obvious alterations.
JF
JamesyFish
I do like the "developing story phrase", but i think there needs to be more identity.
TI
timgraham
I agree with that.. Apart from the background, there isn't actually a logo anywhere (which isn't to say I'm against not having DOGs, but it would seem that'd be a neccessary good for the US).
KA
kareem_j_2002
dbl posted:
Wouldn't work - American graphics like to be OTT and like to be 3D on every single bloody element.


Not true. Several stations (WBZ, WBBM, KTLA, and many others) stay away from over-the-top graphics. That's a hasty generalization. I'm not certain how many US residents post here, but I live a market that has at least 2 stations that do not have OTT graphics. I digress it's overly common.

However, I'll agree that several of our networks (FOX, primarily) take it too far.

These graphics are nice, but it's a little bland.
03
030293
i dont know why but i think it could work for SKY NEWS. Shocked No idea why but anything is better than its current on-screen look.
SU
superdudeman007
I think they've already signed jamesh Sad
JO
Joe
superdudeman007 posted:
I think they've already signed jamesh Sad


Sorry? Do these look anything like his crap?
JO
Jonny
Jugalug posted:
superdudeman007 posted:
I think they've already signed jamesh Sad


Sorry? Do these look anything like his crap?

I could be wrong but I think he meant Sky News' had signed up Jamesh to produce their current graphics. Wonder what he meant be that...
JO
Joe
Sorry, I misread the post; I read it as, "I think they' re already signed jamesh". Apologies.
SU
superdudeman007
Sorry, could have been clearer there Embarassed

Newer posts