JE
If someone is watching one of the 'main' channels (ie; BBC One, ITV, etc) and a significant newsworthy event happens, viewers should be notified about it. Of course the way which that notification happens (eg; on-screen banner, newsflash during an adbreak/between programs or interrupting programming) should depend on the nature of the event/story. However, suggesting that viewers shouldn't be notified about important events when they happen is just absurd.
There seems to be a school of thought that if you are watching the telly, then you wish to be informed of important events instantly. It may come as a shock to a few, that many folk switch on the TV to escape from all the crap that's going on, and not be subjected to even more of it. There's not much that can't wait until later, or the next day as information, and the Capitol events fitted that category (for UK viewers)
If someone is watching one of the 'main' channels (ie; BBC One, ITV, etc) and a significant newsworthy event happens, viewers should be notified about it. Of course the way which that notification happens (eg; on-screen banner, newsflash during an adbreak/between programs or interrupting programming) should depend on the nature of the event/story. However, suggesting that viewers shouldn't be notified about important events when they happen is just absurd.