NJ
That's then just poor design as in an ideal world the logo should work regardless of whether its on a white, black, blue, green or pink with yellow spots coloured background. If a logo would vanish on a dark background you tend to get a lighter coloured alternative, or vice versa, and the fact this one looks like its been chewed on a dark background doesn't change the underlying fact that its still a bit half baked.
Whilst this is a fairly poor mock, it’s also a strange example of where a mock looks better in the light of day...!
The first tranche of comments came through in the evening, when I imagine most members have dark mode enabled. As a result, the transparent background of the logo appeared black, and so you couldn’t really see the logo at all. Now it’s daytime we’re in light mode and the transparent logo behind the background shows as white, meaning that the logo is, at least, much more legible than before. Whether that’s a good thing or not is up for the debate, however!
The first tranche of comments came through in the evening, when I imagine most members have dark mode enabled. As a result, the transparent background of the logo appeared black, and so you couldn’t really see the logo at all. Now it’s daytime we’re in light mode and the transparent logo behind the background shows as white, meaning that the logo is, at least, much more legible than before. Whether that’s a good thing or not is up for the debate, however!
That's then just poor design as in an ideal world the logo should work regardless of whether its on a white, black, blue, green or pink with yellow spots coloured background. If a logo would vanish on a dark background you tend to get a lighter coloured alternative, or vice versa, and the fact this one looks like its been chewed on a dark background doesn't change the underlying fact that its still a bit half baked.
